Abstract:Purpose
This study aims to focus on the practice of knowledge management in Malaysian primary schools. Its objective is to identify the level of five knowledge management dimensions, which includes knowledge acquisition, knowledge refinement, knowledge storage/retrieval, knowledge distribution and knowledge presentation.
Design/methodology/approach
A cross-sectional survey was designed to collect the primary data from 250 primary school teachers within southern Malaysia. The levels of knowledge management pr… Show more
“…KM systems were implemented widely in corporate organizations since the late 1990s, but research on the integration of knowledge practices in schools are few (Fullan, 2002;Lee, Lu, Yang, 2010;Chu, 2016b;Supermane and Tahir, 2018).The role of internet technology and the increasing digitization have increased the complexity of educational practices which made it critical for school organizations to introduce KM (McKenzie, Truc and van Winkelen, 2001;Richard, 2001;Kuo, 2003). School KM was well defined by Cheng (2015) as a set of relatively new organizational activities that make use of knowledge as an important resource to improve organizational behaviours, decisions, student learning, teaching processes and collegial relationships that enable schools to improve their overall performance.…”
Section: Km In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KM was important in improving the performance of human resources in corporate organizations, both manufacturing and services. But KM in education is comparatively under-researched especially in schools as, they lagged behind to accept KM as a practice (Chu, 2016a;Supermane and Tahir, 2018). Therefore, this study analyzes KM in education, focusing on the government schools in India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the recent studies conducted on School KM focused on strategic outcomes of KM including school learning capacity, KM leadership, Teacher Competencies, School effectiveness in terms of career development, initiatives for implementation of KM and Capitalising School knowledge (Cheng, 2012;Chu 2016a;Chu 2016b;Shih and Tsai, 2016;Cheng, 2017;Supermane and Tahir, 2018;Hallinger, Liu and Piyaman, 2019), ignoring the impact of KM on academic performance of the students. This study identified the possible processes and enablers of school KM comprehensively involving all the internal dimensions (curriculum standards, teaching process, learning initiatives, collaborative learning, shared culture and leadership support) and its impact on academic performance.…”
Knowledge Management (KM) systems were implemented widely in corporate organizations for past three decades, but there is little research on KM in schools. The key objectives of this study are to identify the major components of School Knowledge Management and analyze the impact of KM in secondary education on academic performance, based on the perception of school teachers. The survey-based study is conducted in government schools of an Indian State. Exploratory Factor Analysis and Binary Logistic Regression methods are used to identify the KM factors and their impact on academic performance. This study identified the processes and enablers of school KM and its impact on academic performance. Academic performance, being mentioned as the primary outcome of School KM has not been empirically tested from a School KM perspective earlier. Knowledge creation, technology infrastructure and teacher’s competency are identified as KM variables that can significantly influence the Academic Performance and therefore the schools can initiate policies and methods to improve these vital factors.
“…KM systems were implemented widely in corporate organizations since the late 1990s, but research on the integration of knowledge practices in schools are few (Fullan, 2002;Lee, Lu, Yang, 2010;Chu, 2016b;Supermane and Tahir, 2018).The role of internet technology and the increasing digitization have increased the complexity of educational practices which made it critical for school organizations to introduce KM (McKenzie, Truc and van Winkelen, 2001;Richard, 2001;Kuo, 2003). School KM was well defined by Cheng (2015) as a set of relatively new organizational activities that make use of knowledge as an important resource to improve organizational behaviours, decisions, student learning, teaching processes and collegial relationships that enable schools to improve their overall performance.…”
Section: Km In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KM was important in improving the performance of human resources in corporate organizations, both manufacturing and services. But KM in education is comparatively under-researched especially in schools as, they lagged behind to accept KM as a practice (Chu, 2016a;Supermane and Tahir, 2018). Therefore, this study analyzes KM in education, focusing on the government schools in India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the recent studies conducted on School KM focused on strategic outcomes of KM including school learning capacity, KM leadership, Teacher Competencies, School effectiveness in terms of career development, initiatives for implementation of KM and Capitalising School knowledge (Cheng, 2012;Chu 2016a;Chu 2016b;Shih and Tsai, 2016;Cheng, 2017;Supermane and Tahir, 2018;Hallinger, Liu and Piyaman, 2019), ignoring the impact of KM on academic performance of the students. This study identified the possible processes and enablers of school KM comprehensively involving all the internal dimensions (curriculum standards, teaching process, learning initiatives, collaborative learning, shared culture and leadership support) and its impact on academic performance.…”
Knowledge Management (KM) systems were implemented widely in corporate organizations for past three decades, but there is little research on KM in schools. The key objectives of this study are to identify the major components of School Knowledge Management and analyze the impact of KM in secondary education on academic performance, based on the perception of school teachers. The survey-based study is conducted in government schools of an Indian State. Exploratory Factor Analysis and Binary Logistic Regression methods are used to identify the KM factors and their impact on academic performance. This study identified the processes and enablers of school KM and its impact on academic performance. Academic performance, being mentioned as the primary outcome of School KM has not been empirically tested from a School KM perspective earlier. Knowledge creation, technology infrastructure and teacher’s competency are identified as KM variables that can significantly influence the Academic Performance and therefore the schools can initiate policies and methods to improve these vital factors.
“…Pengetahuan baru juga dapat diakuisisi dari sumber data atau informasi eksternal berupa jurnal penelitian, buku, database digital, website, diskusi, pendapat ahli (Costa & Monteiro, 2016;Duarte Alonso et al, 2019;Holsapple, Jones, & Leonard, 2015) Akuisisi pengetahuan bermanfaat bagi individu yang ingin memperkaya dan mengembangkan pengetahuan dalam dirinya. Akuisisi pengetahuan memudahkan seseorang untuk meningkatkan pemahaman, memperkaya wawasan individu sehingga dapat meningkatkan kapabilitas absorbsi, kompetensi, kemampuan berpikir analitis (Supermane & Mohd Tahir, 2018). Pengetahuan yang diperoleh dari proses akuisisi dapat dijadikan pedoman untuk mengambil keputusan dan memecahkan masalah kompleks (Bashir & Farooq, 2019;Boateng, Dzandu, & Tang, 2014;Gope, Elia, & Passiante, 2018).…”
“…KM facilitates the academics to create new knowledge and process the collected one based on their requirements and students' capabilities (Bandyopadhyay et al, 2017). Supermane and Tahir (2018) stated the education system as an efficient medium of a country that can enrich its competitiveness. So, Bangladesh, like other countries, attempts to adapt with the global change through the transformation of its education system.…”
Objective – Aim of this study is to focus on the knowledge management practices of universities in Bangladesh. The study attempts to identify the level of four knowledge management dimensions that includes knowledge discovery, knowledge accumulation, knowledge sharing, and knowledge application. Design/methodology – A questionnaire survey was conducted to collect the primary data from 108 university lecturers in Bangladesh. The knowledge management practices of the universities in Bangladesh were recognized by utilizing a close-ended questionnaires that is adapted from the Becerra-Fernandez and Sabherwal’s Knowledge Management Process (2010). Results – Results indicated that three knowledge management dimensions are moderately practiced by the Bangladeshi universities. However, knowledge accumulation was the dominant dimension in comparison with others, where knowledge sharing was the least dominant dimension of knowledge management. Research limitations/implications – The study will facilitate the authorities of higher educational institutions to develop plans and strategies for practicing the knowledge management in the highest level. It is essential for creating a sound knowledge-based culture in the universities. Further research is recommended increasing the sample size and finding the impact of knowledge management on the organizational performance using SEM Model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.