ªÊÄÇÔÕÐÑ, ÚÕÑ à××ÇÍÕ ³ÂÐßâÍ ÕÂÍÉÇ ÐÂØÑAEËÕ ÂAEÇÍ-ÄÂÕÐÑÇ ÑÃÝâÔÐÇÐËÇ Ä ÓÂÏÍÂØ ÑÃÜÇÌ ÕÇÑÓËË ÑÕÐÑÔËÕÇÎßÐÑ-ÔÕË (°´°) (ÔÏ., ÐÂÒÓËÏÇÓ, [34,35] ²ÂÊÐÑÔÕß ×ÂÊ ÄÔÕÓÇÚÐÞØ ÄÑÎРРÄÞØÑAEÇ ÍÑÎßÙÂ, ÑÃÖÔ-ÎÑÄÎÇÐÐÂâ à××ÇÍÕÑÏ ³ÂÐßâÍÂ, ÔÑÔÕÂÄÎâÇÕ 4. ªÐÕÇÓ×ÇÓÑÏÇÕÓ ÐÇÒÑAEÄËÉÇÐ, ÔÓÇAE ÔÑÄÇÓÛÂÇÕ ÒÑ-ÔÕÖÒÂÕÇÎßÐÑÇ AEÄËÉÇÐËÇ, ÒÓË àÕÑÏ ÇÇ ÅÓÂÐËÙÞ ÒÇÓÇÏÇ-ÜÂáÕÔâ: £ÞÓÂÉÇÐËÇ (14) [5,6,36,38,74,75,91,126,128,245 ÅAEÇ n cal ì ÚÂÔÕÑÕ ÔÄÇÕÂ. ¥ÂÉÇ Ä ÔÎÖÚÂÇ ÑÕÔÖÕÔÕÄËâ ÑÒÕËÚÇÔÍÑÌ ÔÓÇAEÞ Ä ËÐÕÇÓ-×ÇÓÑÏÇÕÓÇ ÏÞ ÒÑÎÖÚËÎË ÊÂÄÞÛÇÐÐÞÌ Ä AEÄ ÓÂÊ ÒÑ ÔÓÂÄÐÇÐËá Ô ÄÞÓÂÉÇÐËÇÏ (7) ÓÇÊÖÎßÕÂÕ, ÍÓÑÏÇ ÕÑÅÑ, ÄÇÎËÚËРF S Ä ÄÞÓÂÉÇÐËË (30) ÒÓÑÒÑÓÙËÑÐÂÎßРn 2 . ¥Îâ ÒÑÎÖÚÇÐËâ "ÒÓÂÄËÎßÐÑÅÑ" ÄÞÓÂÉÇÐËâ ÂÄÕÑÓÞ, ËÔÒÑÎß-ÊÖáÜËÇ AEÂÐÐÞÌ ÏÇÕÑAE ÄÞÚËÔÎÇÐËâ ÄÇÎËÚËÐÞ à××ÇÍÕ ³ÂÐßâÍÂ, ÒÓËÐËÏÂáÕ AEÎËÐÞ ÑÒÕËÚÇÔÍËØ ÒÖÕÇÌ AEÎâ ÄÔÕÓÇÚÐÞØ ÄÑÎÐ ÓÂÄÐÞÏË: ÓÂÔÒÓÑÔÕÓÂÐÇÐËâ ÄÑÎÐÑÄÑÅÑ ÒÂÍÇÕÂ). £ÑÎÐÑÄÞÇ ÚËÔÎÂ Ë AEÎËÐÞ ÒÖÕÇÌ AEÎâ ÄÔÕÓÇÚÐÞØ ÄÑÎÐ Ä ÔËÔÕÇÏÇ ÑÕÔÚÇÕ K ÔÑÔÕÂÄâÕ ÔÑÑÕÄÇÕÔÕÄÇÐÐÑ ÂÒÑÏÐËÏ, ÚÕÑ ÕÂÍÑÌ ÉÇ ÑÛËÃÑÚÐÞÌ ÓÇÊÖÎßÕÂÕ ÃÞÎ ÒÑÎÖÚÇÐ Ä ÓÂÃÑÕÂØ [111,112,114,124,125,140] Different explanations of the Sagnac effect are discussed. It is shown that this effect is a consequence of the composition of velocities law of relativity theory and that it can also be explained adequately within the framework of general relativity. When certain rotation velocity restrictions are imposed, the Sagnac effect can be attributed to the difference in the time retardation (phase shift) of material particle wave functions in the scalar (vector) gravity potential of the inertial forces in a rotating reference frame for counter-propagating waves. It is also shown that all the non-relativistic interpretations of the Sagnac effect, which unfortunately are sometimes found in scientiéc papers, monographs and textbooks, are wrong in principle, even though the results they yield are accurate up to relativistic corrections in some special cases.