2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-006-0170-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Existing Algorithms for Resolving the 180° Ambiguity in Vector Magnetic Fields: Quantitative Tests with Synthetic Data

Abstract: We report here on the present state-of-the-art in algorithms used for resolving the 180 • ambiguity in solar vector magnetic field measurements. With present observations and techniques, 268 T.R. METCALF ET AL. some assumption must be made about the solar magnetic field in order to resolve this ambiguity. Our focus is the application of numerous existing algorithms to test data for which the correct answer is known. In this context, we compare the algorithms quantitatively and seek to understand where each suc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
281
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
281
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To do the physical analyses for the solar eruptive events, a higher-resolution grid should be used in the NLFFF extrapolation calculations (e.g., 1″/pixel, the same resolution as the XRT images). For the magnetograms that are not at the central area of the Sun's disk, the projection effect and the 180°ambiguity in the SP magnetic field data also need to be resolved more carefully and accurately [Georgoulis, 2005;Metcalf et al, 2006;Wiegelmann et al, 2008;Martin et al, 2008;Leka et al, 2009]. Besides the comparison between the extrapolated field lines and the coronal loop images, and the preliminary physical analyses used in this paper, topological techniques and more physical measures should be introduced to quantitatively analyze the topological and physical properties of the extrapolated fields [Longcope, 2005;Zhao et al, 2005;DeVore and Antiochos, 2000;Bleybel et al, 2002;Zhang and Low, 2005;Régnier and Canfield, 2006;Démoulin, 2007;Thalmann et al, 2008;Schrijver et al, 2008;DeRosa et al, 2009] and their relationships to the solar eruptive events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To do the physical analyses for the solar eruptive events, a higher-resolution grid should be used in the NLFFF extrapolation calculations (e.g., 1″/pixel, the same resolution as the XRT images). For the magnetograms that are not at the central area of the Sun's disk, the projection effect and the 180°ambiguity in the SP magnetic field data also need to be resolved more carefully and accurately [Georgoulis, 2005;Metcalf et al, 2006;Wiegelmann et al, 2008;Martin et al, 2008;Leka et al, 2009]. Besides the comparison between the extrapolated field lines and the coronal loop images, and the preliminary physical analyses used in this paper, topological techniques and more physical measures should be introduced to quantitatively analyze the topological and physical properties of the extrapolated fields [Longcope, 2005;Zhao et al, 2005;DeVore and Antiochos, 2000;Bleybel et al, 2002;Zhang and Low, 2005;Régnier and Canfield, 2006;Démoulin, 2007;Thalmann et al, 2008;Schrijver et al, 2008;DeRosa et al, 2009] and their relationships to the solar eruptive events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29] The 180°ambiguity in the Level 2 data of the three SP vector magnetograms was resolved by using the method proposed by Wang et al [2001], in which the azimuth of the magnetic field is determined by a reference field (LFFF) with a force-free factor best fitting the observed field [Wang et al, 2001;Metcalf et al, 2006]. In order to apply the azimuth disambiguation algorithm, the original SP magnetogram data (nonuniform 1000 × 512 grid, hereinafter referred to as original data) were first resampled to a uniform grid with 582 × 320 pixels (0.507″/pixel, hereinafter referred to as resampled data).…”
Section: Sot-sp Photospheric Vector Magnetogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plethora of methods have been proposed to resolve this ambiguity (for an overview, see Metcalf et al, 2006). For disambiguation of HMI data, a variant on the "Minimum Energy" method (Metcalf, 1994) called ME0 has been implemented.…”
Section: The Disambiguation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been shown to be among the best performing on a wide range of tests on synthetic data for which the answer is known (Metcalf et al, 2006;Leka et al, 2009). However, Leka et al (2009) showed that the minimum energy state is not always the correct ambiguity resolution in the presence of noise.…”
Section: The Disambiguation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation