An overview of drive systems and sealing types in stirred bioreactors used in biotechnological processes

Abstract

No matter the scale, stirred tank bioreactors are the most commonly used systems in biotechnological production processes. Single-use and reusable systems are supplied by several manufacturers. The type, size, and number of impellers used in these systems have a significant influence on the characteristics and designs of bioreactors. Depending on the desired application, classic shaft-driven systems, bearing-mounted drives, or stirring elements that levitate freely in the vessel may be employed. In systems with drive shafts, process hygiene requirements also affect the type of seal used. For sensitive processes with high hygienic requirements, magnetic-driven stirring systems, which have been the focus of much research in recent years, are recommended. This review provides the reader with an overview of the most common agitation and seal types implemented in stirred bioreactor systems, highlights their advantages and disadvantages, and explains their possible fields of application. Special attention is paid to the development of magnetically driven agitators, which are widely used in reusable systems and are also becoming more and more important in their single-use counterparts.Key Points• Basic design of the most frequently used bioreactor type: the stirred tank bioreactor• Differences in most common seal types in stirred systems and fields of application• Comprehensive overview of commercially available bioreactor seal types• Increased use of magnetically driven agitation systems in single-use bioreactors

Application of bioreactor technology for cell culture-based viral vaccine production: Present status and future prospects

“…As two-stage bioreactors ( Frensing et al, 2013 ), continuous bioreactors can be operated under steady-state conditions (fixed cell and metabolite concentrations, and pH, and avoiding a shutdown for cleaning and sterilization). Cell culture bioreactors can be divided into mechanical stirring bioreactors ( YekrangSafakar et al, 2018 ; Schirmer et al, 2021 ), airlift bioreactors ( Al-Mashhadani et al, 2015 ), hollow fiber bioreactors ( Knazek et al, 1972 ; Jyothilekshmi and Jayaprakash, 2021 ), and disposable bioreactors ( Junne and Neubauer, 2018 ; Jyothilekshmi and Jayaprakash, 2021 ). According to how the cells are cultured, these bioreactors can be divided into three types: Adherent culture bioreactors, embedded culture bioreactors, and suspension culture bioreactor.…”

“…Adherent culture (Atlas, 1999;Al-Mashhadani et al, 2015;YekrangSafakar et al, 2018;Schirmer et al, 2021) Stirring bioreactor…”

Laboratory-independent exploration of stirred bioreactors and their fluid dynamics

“…Bioreactors are used in numerous applications, including environmental biotechnology (biogas production Duarte et al (2021)), the production of plant cell culture extracts for the cosmetics industry (Georgiev et al, 2018), as well as the production of monoclonal antibodies, vaccines (Schirmer et al, 2020;Maschke et al, 2022) and cell therapeutics (Jossen et al, 2020). A variety of different mechanically, hydraulically and pneumatically driven bioreactor systems exist, with stirred bioreactors being the most widely used type (Seidel and Eibl, 2021;Jossen et al, 2019;Schirmer et al, 2021;Seidel et al, 2020). The design and components of stirred bioreactors differ depending on the production organism and the product they express.…”

Improved Time Resolved KPI and Strain Characterization of Multiple Hosts in Shake Flasks Using Advanced Online Analytics and Data Science

“…Strain/cell line and medium characterization are still most frequently performed in shake flasks, justified by their low costs, ease of use, and ability to be run in parallel [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. This removes the complex preparation requirements of traditional bioreactors as well as the high costs of using stirred single-use systems with control units [ 22 ]. Despite these evident advantages, automated mini-bioreactors [ 23 , 24 ] and well plates [ 25 , 26 , 27 ] are more often used than shake flasks for this purpose because of one major weakness of this cultivation system: the lack of standardized online measurement and control, making the application of QbD in early-stage development more difficult for shake flasks.…”