2003
DOI: 10.1362/146934703771910080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Content Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
213
0
14

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
213
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, what is termed as the "content" of the analysis is a consensual interpretation among the authors (Harwood and Garry, 2003). This content will be "thematic" in general patterns identified in the information -the "themes" -will be identified, but there will not be any in-depth examination of their specific details, once identified as patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, what is termed as the "content" of the analysis is a consensual interpretation among the authors (Harwood and Garry, 2003). This content will be "thematic" in general patterns identified in the information -the "themes" -will be identified, but there will not be any in-depth examination of their specific details, once identified as patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data gathered was analysed using thematic content analysis, given the suitability of this technique for exploratory analysis of unstructured data (Mayring, 2000;Hsieh & Shannon, 2005;Harwood & Garry, 2003). To this end, a thematic categorization was made, sorting the data according to its semantic similarities, following the structure proposed by Graneheim and Lundman (2004):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dual form of interrogation was an attempt to increase the credibility and dependability (Guba, 1981;and Lincoln and Guba, 1985) of the choice of both key themes and sub-themes through a triangulation process. NVivo 11 was further used to explore these sub-themes by helping to pull together each of these sub-themes from all the interviews (Harwood and Garry, 2003). In this way, it was possible to capture each respondent's comments across transcripts and the various available documentation (Riessman, 1993) on each supported sub-theme and place them together for further consideration and analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%