2017
DOI: 10.1107/s2059798317008920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of comparative modelling and resources dedicated to large-scale modelling of genome sequences

Abstract: Computational modelling of proteins has been a major catalyst in structural biology. Bioinformatics groups have exploited the repositories of known structures to predict high-quality structural models with high efficiency at low cost. This article provides an overview of comparative modelling, reviews recent developments and describes resources dedicated to large-scale comparative modelling of genome sequences. The value of subclustering protein domain superfamilies to guide the template-selection process is i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…catalytic residues in CSA 26 . They have also been shown to be structurally coherent 64,70 . Highly conserved sites within CATH-FunFams (also described as FunSites) are found by analysing sequence conservation in a multiple sequence alignment of the FunFam, using the scorecons algorithm 71 .…”
Section: Cath-funfams Are Sets Of Evolutionary Related Domains Clustementioning
confidence: 97%
“…catalytic residues in CSA 26 . They have also been shown to be structurally coherent 64,70 . Highly conserved sites within CATH-FunFams (also described as FunSites) are found by analysing sequence conservation in a multiple sequence alignment of the FunFam, using the scorecons algorithm 71 .…”
Section: Cath-funfams Are Sets Of Evolutionary Related Domains Clustementioning
confidence: 97%
“…For FunFams that had a known domain structure, we annotated the splice events using the FlyBase/Ensembl to PDB mapping. For FunFams that had no relative of known structure, we used the FunMod modelling pipeline (29,30) which exploits the MODELLER (42) algorithm to build structural models. We used normalised DOPE (43) and GA341 (44) to assess the quality of the models.…”
Section: Annotating Mxe Events With Structural Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatives in FunFams have highly similar structures and functions (27,28). Splice regions were mapped to known structures where available, or homology models built using the in-house FunMod modelling pipeline (29,30). If no model could be built, splice events were aligned to known structures using an in-house HMMbased protocol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…choosing the most relevant enzymeligand complex for their analyses in structure-based drug design applications but will also help the structural bioinformatics community in selecting suitable structural representatives for protein family-based studies on ligand diversity (Najmanovich, 2017), function evolution (Das et al, 2015), and structural modeling (Lam et al, 2017), among others. For example, the carbonic anhydrase superfamily in CATH (Dawson et al, 2017) contains many carbonic anhydrase enzyme structures with different ligands bound in different parts of the structure (Figure 2A).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%