2016
DOI: 10.5598/imafungus.2016.07.01.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of Australia’s Phytophthora species assemblage in natural ecosystems recovered from a survey in Victoria

Abstract: Although Phytophthora species cause serious diseases worldwide, until recently the main focus on disease in natural ecosystems in southern Australia has been on the distribution and impact of P. cinnamomi. However, new Phytophthora pathogens have emerged from natural ecosystems, and there is a need to better understand the diversity and distribution of these species in our natural forests, woodlands and heathlands. From a survey along a 70 km pipeline easement in Victoria, Phytophthora species were isolated fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sampling in the current study focussed only on soil and, as such, we may have missed a significant component of the Phytophthoradiversity. However, in the current study we sampled many more sites over a larger geographical area than any previous studies, and detected phylotypes of all the Clade 6 species (P. inundata, P. amnicola, P. thermophila, P. litoralis, P. fluvialis and P. moyootj) previously isolated from water bodies in Australia Hüberli et al 2013;Nagel et al 2013;Burgess 2015;Dunstan et al 2016). In particular, two species, P. thermophila and P. litoralis, were common in all states and although they were first reported from water they are also now commonly isolated from soil (CPSM database).…”
Section: Phytophthora Species Detected Within Australiamentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Sampling in the current study focussed only on soil and, as such, we may have missed a significant component of the Phytophthoradiversity. However, in the current study we sampled many more sites over a larger geographical area than any previous studies, and detected phylotypes of all the Clade 6 species (P. inundata, P. amnicola, P. thermophila, P. litoralis, P. fluvialis and P. moyootj) previously isolated from water bodies in Australia Hüberli et al 2013;Nagel et al 2013;Burgess 2015;Dunstan et al 2016). In particular, two species, P. thermophila and P. litoralis, were common in all states and although they were first reported from water they are also now commonly isolated from soil (CPSM database).…”
Section: Phytophthora Species Detected Within Australiamentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Phytophthora cinnamomi has long been recognised in Australia (Burgess et al 2017a), but P. multivora is a recently described species, previously mis-identified as P. citricola (Scott et al 2009). All records of P. citricola isolated from agriculture and urban settings in Australia have been reclassified as P. multivora (Burgess et al 2009, Barber et al 2013, Dunstan et al 2016. Many of the other more common species detected in this study such as P. plurivora, P. pseudocryptogea, P. nicotianeae and P. niederhauseri are also considered to be introduced, and associated with agriculture and horticulture.…”
Section: Patterns Of Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…() recovered more than 60% in a similar study. The superabundance of clade 6 species in rivers possibly decreased the power of baiting soil species from rivers, which could explain why in other studies some species, such as P. cinnamomi , have been rarely recovered from streams flowing through infected stream‐sides (Dunstan et al., ). However, when using a DNA‐based high throughput sequencing method, which enabled a deeper level of sampling than by baiting, Català et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%