2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01664.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of atypical enteropathogenicEscherichia coli

Abstract: The enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) pathotype is currently divided into two groups, typical EPEC (tEPEC) and atypical EPEC (aEPEC). The property that distinguishes these two groups is the presence of the EPEC adherence factor plasmid, which is only found in tEPEC. aEPEC strains are emerging enteropathogens that have been detected worldwide. Herein, we review the serotypes, virulence properties, genetic relationships, epidemiology, reservoir and diagnosis of aEPEC, including those strains not belonging… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

8
205
1
46

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(168 reference statements)
8
205
1
46
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some zoonotic pathogens, such as Campylobacter jejuni, are recognized as the most frequent gastrointestinal bacterial pathogen in humans in industrialized countries (11,12), the contribution of other zoonotic pathogens (such as enteropathogenic E. coli or many strains of Shiga-toxigenic E. coli) to human diarrhea is less understood (13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some zoonotic pathogens, such as Campylobacter jejuni, are recognized as the most frequent gastrointestinal bacterial pathogen in humans in industrialized countries (11,12), the contribution of other zoonotic pathogens (such as enteropathogenic E. coli or many strains of Shiga-toxigenic E. coli) to human diarrhea is less understood (13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results clearly demonstrated a delay in bacterial adhesion and formation of actin-rich pedestals in aEPEC, in comparison to that observed with tEPEC strains. There are some factors that could explain these results, such as the absence of BFP and Per, both located in pEAF (11). In fact, all aEPEC strains of this study lack the perABC sequences (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…On the other hand, aEPEC strains frequently display a localized adherence-like (LAL) pattern, in which the compact clusters are not observed (19). In contrast to the LA pattern, which can be observed after 3 h of bacterium-eukaryotic cell contact (17), the LAL pattern is expressed after 6 h of interaction (11). Consequently, the A/E lesions can be detected in tEPEC after 3 h of interaction, while in aEPEC this phenotype is delayed and not detected until after 6 h (20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…aEPEC has phenotypic and genotypic properties different from those of typical enteropathogenic E. coli (tEPEC), which causes diarrhea mainly in children Ͻ2 years old (4). The frequency of aEPEC strains has increased in both diarrheic and nondiarrheic children to the point that tEPEC strains are often outnumbered in regions where diarrhea due to E. coli is endemic (5,6). The main difference between aEPEC and tEPEC is the absence of the EPEC adherence factor plasmid (pEAF) in the former group (4,7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%