2013 15th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/epe.2013.6634486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overlapping multi-hexagon space vector modulation scheme for modular multilevel cascade converters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modulation controls for this topology have already been investigated in detail in [5,6] and phase Shift PWM control will be discussed here in brief. For this investigation a unipolar phase-shifted PWM (PS-PWM) scheme is applied for the MMFCC-STATCOM.…”
Section: Phase Shift Pwm For Mmfcc-statcommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modulation controls for this topology have already been investigated in detail in [5,6] and phase Shift PWM control will be discussed here in brief. For this investigation a unipolar phase-shifted PWM (PS-PWM) scheme is applied for the MMFCC-STATCOM.…”
Section: Phase Shift Pwm For Mmfcc-statcommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far in literature no work has been published on STATCOM with this configuration. Some work has been done with regards to investigating the converter structures for high power applications and pulse width modulation and space vector schemes [5][6][7]whilst most of other STATCOM schemes implemented focus mainly on the Cascaded Hbridge MMCC topology [4,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these two types, current developments in MMCC topologies also consider other structures, particularly the 5-level NPC (5L-NPC) and 5-level FC (5L-FC) types [13,[16][17][18][19] and their hybrid combinations. The advantages of these 5-level modules are that they offer more switching states and voltage levels per module, hence with the same number of modules as when using 3L-FBs, the converter output voltage is higher and harmonic performance is better.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents a new STATCOM for unbalanced load compensation using a variant of the SSBC-MMCC [10] known as the single star flying capacitor converter MMCC (SSFCC-MMCC). Each module is a basic single phase three-level full bridge flying capacitor converter (3L-FCC) which synthesizes three voltage levels (0, ±0.5VDC, ±VDC) [11]. Comparing to the MMCC using H-bridge cells the main advantage of this topology is having more degrees of freedom in control at the sub-module level, hence it is more flexible for converters requiring high performance dynamic control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%