2015
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa4506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An over-massive black hole in a typical star-forming galaxy, 2 billion years after the Big Bang

Abstract: Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and their host galaxies are generally thought to coevolve, so that the SMBH achieves up to about 0.2 to 0.5% of the host galaxy mass in the present day. The radiation emitted from the growing SMBH is expected to affect star formation throughout the host galaxy. The relevance of this scenario at early cosmic epochs is not yet established. We present spectroscopic observations of a galaxy at redshift z = 3.328, which hosts an actively 1 accreting, extremely massive BH, in its fin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
55
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
12
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The BH masses and SFR of the high-redshift massive model galaxies cover a broad range, and the median value of M BH is about ∼10 8 M , consistent with that of the observed galaxies with the similar stellar masses (e.g. Lauer et al 2007;Gültekin et al 2009;Sani et al 2011;Trakhtenbrot et al 2015). For the two ZF analogues at z = 3.86, their BH masses are…”
Section: Formation Of Quiescent Galaxies In Cdmsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The BH masses and SFR of the high-redshift massive model galaxies cover a broad range, and the median value of M BH is about ∼10 8 M , consistent with that of the observed galaxies with the similar stellar masses (e.g. Lauer et al 2007;Gültekin et al 2009;Sani et al 2011;Trakhtenbrot et al 2015). For the two ZF analogues at z = 3.86, their BH masses are…”
Section: Formation Of Quiescent Galaxies In Cdmsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A smaller fvir by itself has a number of interesting consequences. For example, it may ease the challenge of growing very massive black holes in the early Universe (e.g., Mortlock et al 2011;Trakhtenbrot et al 2015;Wu et al 2015), alleviates the need to invoke very massive seeds (e.g., Alexander & Natarajan 2014; Madau et al 2014;Lupi et al 2015), and it may also add some empirical evidence towards the existence of intermediate-mass black holes (e.g., Farrell et al 2014).…”
Section: Direct Implications Of the Bias In The Observed Scaling Relamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, for the faint and the high-z AGN population that could be responsible for the reionization of the universe (see Giallongo et al 2015), Chandra (Weisskopf et al 2002) is the preferred instrument. Indeed, the large (1.8 Ms) Chandra COSMOS survey (C-COSMOS; Elvis et al 2009, E09;Puccetti et al 2009, P09;Civano et al 2012) has already contributed significantly to the study of the early epochs of the universe with the following findings: three luminous AGN residing in protoclusters between z∼4.55 and 5.3 (Capak et al 2011); the largest sample of X-ray selected z>3 quasars in a contiguous field (81 sources, Civano et al 2011); a precocious SMBH in a normal-sized galaxy at z>3 (Trakhtenbrot et al 2015); and AGN correlation lengths of h 7 1 -Mpc (∼10′) at z∼1-2, Allevato et al 2011). However, C-COSMOS only covered 1 4 of COSMOS at ∼160 ks depth plus 0.5 deg 2 at ∼80 ks depth ( Figure 1, green squares).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%