2014
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Outbreak of Respiratory Tularemia Caused by Diverse Clones of Francisella tularensis

Abstract: The outbreak was caused by diverse clones of F. tularensis that occurred concomitantly, were widespread, and apparently persisted in the environment. Multiple independent acquisitions of F. tularensis from the environment over a short time period suggest that natural outbreaks of respiratory tularemia are triggered by environmental cues. The findings additionally caution against interpreting genome sequence identity for this pathogen as proof of a direct epidemiological link.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

8
47
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in analogy with those reported in a recent genomic study of a respiratory tularaemia outbreak in Sweden [30]. In the latter study it was shown that the respiratory form of tularaemia was not tied to specific genotypes of F. tularensis and that outbreak genomes shared high sequence similarity with archived isolates originating from patients from distant geographical regions and collected up to 10 years apart [30]. Despite the mentioned lack of significant association in our study, it is worth noting that F. tularensis of clade B.12 was found mainly in patients with ulceroglandular tularaemia, and that all three isolates from patients with typhoidal tularaemia belonged to subclade B.7 (Table).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are in analogy with those reported in a recent genomic study of a respiratory tularaemia outbreak in Sweden [30]. In the latter study it was shown that the respiratory form of tularaemia was not tied to specific genotypes of F. tularensis and that outbreak genomes shared high sequence similarity with archived isolates originating from patients from distant geographical regions and collected up to 10 years apart [30]. Despite the mentioned lack of significant association in our study, it is worth noting that F. tularensis of clade B.12 was found mainly in patients with ulceroglandular tularaemia, and that all three isolates from patients with typhoidal tularaemia belonged to subclade B.7 (Table).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our findings are in analogy with those reported in a recent genomic study of a respiratory tularaemia outbreak in Sweden [30]. In the latter study it was shown that the respiratory form of tularaemia was not tied to specific genotypes of F. tularensis and that outbreak genomes shared high sequence similarity with archived isolates originating from patients from distant geographical regions and collected up to 10 years apart [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, there are no data on generation times or mutation rates in environmental B. pseudomallei strains, with evolution and doubling rates likely to vastly differ from those of in vitro-or mammalian-passaged strains. This issue of different generation times has recently been exemplified in an outbreak of Francisella tularensis (tularemia) in Sweden, where no correlations between spatial, temporal, and genetic distances were found (46). Third, there is insufficient resolution among the Australian ST-562 genomes, as evidenced by several polytomies in our ST-562 phylogenies (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It was not until November 1997 that a new tularemia focus appeared and new F. tularensis strains were isolated in Bulgaria. Recent genomic epidemiological studies of tularemia in Sweden and Norway have revealed strains that are almost 100% identical at the genome level despite being isolated many years apart and/or separated by several hundreds of km (8, 9). In light of these findings, we asked if the clone/clones that caused the recent epidemics in Bulgaria were the same as those that occurred in the early 1960s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%