1979
DOI: 10.1016/0097-3165(79)90065-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ordered version of the Erdös-Ko-Rado theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This generalises a well-known result that was first stated by Meyer [31] and proved in different ways by Deza and Frankl [10], Bollobás and Leader [4], Engel [11] and Erdős et al [12], and that can be described by saying that the conjecture is true for F = [n] r . Berge [3] and Livingston [30] had proved (i) and (ii) respectively for the special case F = {[n]} (other proofs are found in [18,32]). In [5] the conjecture is also verified for F uniform and EKR; Holroyd and Talbot [20] had essentially proved (i) for such a family F in a graph-theoretical context.…”
Section: Intersecting Families Of Signed Setsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This generalises a well-known result that was first stated by Meyer [31] and proved in different ways by Deza and Frankl [10], Bollobás and Leader [4], Engel [11] and Erdős et al [12], and that can be described by saying that the conjecture is true for F = [n] r . Berge [3] and Livingston [30] had proved (i) and (ii) respectively for the special case F = {[n]} (other proofs are found in [18,32]). In [5] the conjecture is also verified for F uniform and EKR; Holroyd and Talbot [20] had essentially proved (i) for such a family F in a graph-theoretical context.…”
Section: Intersecting Families Of Signed Setsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are several other papers in the general area, for example [1][2][3]7,[10][11][12]14,[16][17][18]24,27].…”
Section: Theorem 13 (See Deza and Franklmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When m = n, we get the well known EKR Theorem. When m = 0, Berge [1] determined the maximum size of intersecting families of labeled n-sets, Livingston [11] characterized partial optimal intersecting families and Borg [3] completely solved it by using the shift operator in an inductive argument. Theorem 1.2 [1,3,11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%