2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2011.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An orange-eye mutant of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in Haematobia irritans (Lohmeyer et al ., ), Exorista japonica (Ichiki et al ., ) and Lygus lineolaris (Snodgrass, ), natality and egg eclosion are not significantly different between mutant and wild types. In our study, there were no significant differences between the red‐eye mutant and brown‐eye wild types in terms of the number of eggs produced per females, percentage of egg validity and third to fifth instar survival, which is different from the red‐eye mutant in Japan (Mochida, ) but is the same with the orange‐eye mutant in Korea (Seo et al ., ). However, the first to third instar nymph survival rate was lower in red‐eye mutants than in the brown‐eye ones, and this may be the reason why the ratios of brown‐eye to red‐eye BPH were biased in several crosses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in Haematobia irritans (Lohmeyer et al ., ), Exorista japonica (Ichiki et al ., ) and Lygus lineolaris (Snodgrass, ), natality and egg eclosion are not significantly different between mutant and wild types. In our study, there were no significant differences between the red‐eye mutant and brown‐eye wild types in terms of the number of eggs produced per females, percentage of egg validity and third to fifth instar survival, which is different from the red‐eye mutant in Japan (Mochida, ) but is the same with the orange‐eye mutant in Korea (Seo et al ., ). However, the first to third instar nymph survival rate was lower in red‐eye mutants than in the brown‐eye ones, and this may be the reason why the ratios of brown‐eye to red‐eye BPH were biased in several crosses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Compound eye color is an important biological character of insects and many eye color mutants have been described in Diptera (Lohmeyer et al ., ), Hemiptera (Mochida, ; Shimizu & Kawasaki, ; Snodgrass, ; Seo et al ., ), Coleoptera (Lorenzen et al ., ) and Lepidoptera (Wraight et al ., ). The mutated eye colors include red, white, yellow and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brown planthopper (BPH), N. lugens, is a hemimetabolism insect and a notorious rice pest in East Asian countries (Cheng, 2009). The wild-type compound eye color of BPH is brown, while red-eye color mutation phenotype can also be observed (Seo et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2014). In order to clarify the ommochrome synthesis pathway of this insect pest, we cloned and characterized the cardinal ortholog gene from BPH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mating behavior, egg production, developmental duration and mortality of nymphal stages were not significantly different between the normal-eyed and colored-eye mutant colonies [2] [3]. However, some phenotypes (i.e., egg lethal effect, poor fecundity and survival ability) might be related to the eye color mutations [3] [5]. Genes having a stronger compensation ability for reproduction may also closely link to the red eye allele [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The BPH has a diploid chromosome number of 30 (28 autosomes combined with the sex determination system XY and XX in males and females, respectively) [1]. Among the few visible mutations in the BPH, eye color is one of the mutations that are regularly observed in laboratories [2] [3]. In Delphacidae, red-eyed mutants were reported in the small brown planthopper Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén) [4] and BPH [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%