2014
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Orally Available, Small-Molecule Polymerase Inhibitor Shows Efficacy Against a Lethal Morbillivirus Infection in a Large Animal Model

Abstract: Measles virus (MeV) is a highly infectious morbillivirus responsible for major human morbidity and mortality in the non-vaccinated. The related, zoonotic canine distemper virus (CDV) induces morbillivirus disease in ferrets with 100% lethality. We report an orally available, shelf-stable pan-morbillivirus inhibitor that targets the viral polymerase. Prophylactic oral treatment of ferrets infected intranasally with a lethal CDV dose reduced viremia and prolonged survival. Equally infected ferrets receiving post… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For measles virus, resistance to a non-nucleoside analog inhibitor that blocks gene expression maps to the polymerase domain (Krumm et al, 2014). The positions of those mutations, mapped onto VSV-L, flank the GDNQ motif at the RdRp catalytic site, suggesting an allosteric mechanism, like that of the non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors for HIV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For measles virus, resistance to a non-nucleoside analog inhibitor that blocks gene expression maps to the polymerase domain (Krumm et al, 2014). The positions of those mutations, mapped onto VSV-L, flank the GDNQ motif at the RdRp catalytic site, suggesting an allosteric mechanism, like that of the non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors for HIV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prophylaxis with the nucleoside inhibitor reduced the viral titer in vivo and prolonged survival; however, all 9 animals-those treated before infection and those with continued treatment throughout infection-eventually died (91). Surprisingly, efficacy was 100% in the 3 animals who were treated only 3 days postinfection (without prophylaxis) (91).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prophylaxis with the nucleoside inhibitor reduced the viral titer in vivo and prolonged survival; however, all 9 animals-those treated before infection and those with continued treatment throughout infection-eventually died (91). Surprisingly, efficacy was 100% in the 3 animals who were treated only 3 days postinfection (without prophylaxis) (91). To explain these results, the authors posit that the postinfection treatment was effective because it allowed for a boost in immunity elicited by viral replication during the first 3 days but then prevented depletion of T and B lymphocytes (17,21,28,65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, therapeutic interventions to control CDV infection may also be considered for valuable animals. Among the most promising candidates is an orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of the MeV polymerase that was able to rescue ferrets from lethal CDV challenge when given shortly after infection [90]. Strategies targeting viral entry or fusion, which also use small molecule inhibitors [91,92], as well as the first generation of host-targeting molecules [93], are reaching the state of preclinical testing, which will likely also involve one of the CDV surrogate models.…”
Section: Vaccine and Drug Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%