Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/isscs.2015.7203971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimized NLMS algorithm for acoustic echo cancellation

Abstract: In order to improve the overall performance of the normalized least-mean-square (NLMS) algorithm, there is the need to control its main parameters, i.e., the normalized stepsize and regularization terms. In this context, the variable stepsize and variable regularized versions of the NLMS algorithm are designed to address the conflicting requirement of fast convergence and low misadjustment. In this paper, we propose an optimized NLMS algorithm for acoustic echo cancellation (AEC). This algorithm is based on a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it does not include influences of the remaining impulse responses present in the form of reverberation of measurement tanks. A summary of the NPVSS‐NLMS and the JO‐NLMS is provided in the publication [19]. In it, the derivations and the results of the different algorithms for applying acoustic echo cancellation are compared.…”
Section: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it does not include influences of the remaining impulse responses present in the form of reverberation of measurement tanks. A summary of the NPVSS‐NLMS and the JO‐NLMS is provided in the publication [19]. In it, the derivations and the results of the different algorithms for applying acoustic echo cancellation are compared.…”
Section: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simplest case, this is controlled by a fixed step size that determines the adaptation speed and the so-called steady-state performance (that determines the final quality of the estimation). However, a variable step size can often achieve much better performance with respect to both of these quantities [16][17][18][19][20]. This publication presents a novel method for determining an adaptive step size control in an optimal manner, which uses the theoretical behaviour of timeinvariant systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define Z as a sequence of dimension ][1×Kfalse~ at i th iteration as Z)(i=][ZU,ZnormalH1,ZnormalH2,,ZKfalse~,ZL If Xfalse(ifalse) is a sequence which is given by X)(i=][k=1Kfalse~Pnormaltkfalse(j1false),2C1)(j1,2C2)(j1,,2CKfalse~)(j1,ITHIT Then following (32a)–(32c) and (33)–(35), we have X)(i=k=1Kfalse~ωkfalse(jfalse))(iykiT+Z)(i where yk)(i is the corresponding k th value of Y)(i. If the proposed method is solved by using the NLMS algorithm, then the desired output of the system is given by [24] d)(i=X)(ik=1…”
Section: Proposed Novel Solution Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%