2008
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimized microplate assay system for quantitative evaluation of plant cell wall–degrading enzyme activity of fungal culture extracts

Abstract: Developing enzyme cocktails for cellulosic biomass hydrolysis complementary to current cellulase systems is a critical step needed for economically viable biofuels production. Recent genomic analysis indicates that some plant pathogenic fungi are likely a largely untapped resource in which to prospect for novel hydrolytic enzymes for biomass conversion. In order to develop high throughput screening assays for enzyme bioprospecting, a standardized microplate assay was developed for rapid analysis of polysacchar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
102
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
102
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some steps in the lignocellulose to ethanol pipeline have previously been automated, e.g., pretreatments, enzyme digestions, or sugar analyses [22][23][24][25][26][27], but the system described here automates all steps from tissue grinding through sugar analysis. Human intervention is necessary to load the input tubes and add the metal grinding balls; to load the racks with output tubes; and to transfer the plates three times, first, to the liquid-handling robot for addition of pretreatment solutions and enzymes, second, to the incubating oven, and, third, back to the robot for the sugar assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some steps in the lignocellulose to ethanol pipeline have previously been automated, e.g., pretreatments, enzyme digestions, or sugar analyses [22][23][24][25][26][27], but the system described here automates all steps from tissue grinding through sugar analysis. Human intervention is necessary to load the input tubes and add the metal grinding balls; to load the racks with output tubes; and to transfer the plates three times, first, to the liquid-handling robot for addition of pretreatment solutions and enzymes, second, to the incubating oven, and, third, back to the robot for the sugar assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro hydrolysis reactions were performed in 96-well flat-bottom plates (Sarstedt) corresponding to King et al 54 . Cell-free supernatants of C. reinhardtii or Chlorella kessleri cultivated in air-bubbled MM ( ± CMC) containing antibiotics (25 mg ml À 1 kasugamycin) and fungicides (5 mg ml À 1 carbendacime) were used for the in vitro hydrolysis assay.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNS (3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid) reducing sugar assay was performed in a 96-well microplate format according to King et al 54 , and DNS reagent was prepared as previously described 56,57 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cellulolytic activity of the biopreparation was determined in liquid culture filtrates and based on cellulolytic activity (FPU) after 60 min of incubation at 50 °C and 37 °C (Mandels et al 1976;King et al 2009). The amount of the enzyme that liberated 1 µM of glucose (reducing sugars) during 1 min at 50 °C was assumed as a FPU activity unit (Weldesemayat 2011;Janas and Targoński 2014).…”
Section: Enzymatic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%