2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimized inverse modelling method for determining the location and strength of a point source releasing airborne material in urban environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is interchangeable without any other changes to the algorithm and should be chosen to reflect the current scenario. For example, the numerical atmospheric‐dispersion modelling environment (NAME) dispersion model is used by the UK Met Office to forecast long range ash dispersion from a volcanic eruption (Jones, Thomson, Hort, & Devenish, ), whereas CFD‐based methods have been developed for complex geometries, such as urban environments (Efthimiou et al, ; Keats, Yee, & Lien, ). In this study, two models are compared, both derived from analytical solutions to the advection–diffusion equation with various assumptions: The standard GP model (Wang et al, ) and a more simplified model assuming isotropic diffusion (Vergassola et al, ), which shall be referred to as the IP model.…”
Section: Source Term Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is interchangeable without any other changes to the algorithm and should be chosen to reflect the current scenario. For example, the numerical atmospheric‐dispersion modelling environment (NAME) dispersion model is used by the UK Met Office to forecast long range ash dispersion from a volcanic eruption (Jones, Thomson, Hort, & Devenish, ), whereas CFD‐based methods have been developed for complex geometries, such as urban environments (Efthimiou et al, ; Keats, Yee, & Lien, ). In this study, two models are compared, both derived from analytical solutions to the advection–diffusion equation with various assumptions: The standard GP model (Wang et al, ) and a more simplified model assuming isotropic diffusion (Vergassola et al, ), which shall be referred to as the IP model.…”
Section: Source Term Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probabilistic category treats source parameters as random variables associated with the probability distribution. This includes the Bayesian estimation theory (Bocquet, 2005;Monache et al, 2008;Yee et al, 2014), Monte Carlo algorithms using Markov chains (MCMC) (Gamerman and Lopes, 2006;Keats, 2009), and various stochastic sampling algorithms (Zhang et al, 2014(Zhang et al, , 2015. Deterministic methods use cost functions to assess the difference between observed and modeled concentrations and are based on an iterative process to minimize this difference (Seibert, 2001;Penenko et al, 2002;Sharan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few have focused on the source reconstruction performance of AQMN in optimal design. Recently, many studies in the literature have explored how to reconstruct source characteristics based on the measurements from a dense AQMN and have analyzed the influence of the AQMN distribution on the back-calculation [17][18][19][20], while only single emission episodes were considered as the concerned objectives in these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambient concentration data were replaced by simulated concentrations generated by the dispersion model. Different types of dispersion models such as Gaussian plume model, Gaussian puff model, Lagrangian stochastic model, and computational fluid dynamics [20,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] can be used for simulating dispersion in pollution detection and source reconstruction. The Gaussian puff model was employed here instead of a refined method to reproduce the spatial and temporal variations of H 2 S concentrations for the studied industrial park because emission sources arranged densely and accurate environmental conditions are always difficult to obtain for a refined simulation using a model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%