2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3392-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimization method of the machining parameters in high-speed machining of stainless steel using coated carbide tool for best surface finish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study showed feed rate as the most prominent factor influencing cutting force and surface roughness, moreover, lower values of feed rate and depth of cut were recommended to achieve minimum machining forces and better surface roughness [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This study showed feed rate as the most prominent factor influencing cutting force and surface roughness, moreover, lower values of feed rate and depth of cut were recommended to achieve minimum machining forces and better surface roughness [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The optimum cutting speed, feed, and depth of cut were 70m/min, 0.10mm/tooth, and 1.02mm, respectively. The significant improvement in surface finish (Ra < 0.4μm) eliminates the need for grinding and polishing Ahmad Hamdan et.al [14] presents an optimization method of the machining parameters in high speed machining of stainless steel using coated carbide tool to achieve minimum cutting forces and better surface roughness. The standard orthogonal array of L9 was employed in this research work and the results were analysed for the optimization process using S/N ratio response analysis and ANOVA to identify the most significant parameters affecting the cutting forces and surface roughness.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ellas se muestran la contribución de cada factor y la importancia estadística para un 95 % de confianza. En la investigación fueron significativos el avance de corte y el tiempo principal de corte, similar conclusión determinada por Galanis y Manolakos [13] y Hamdan [14]. Se realizó un análisis de regresión múltiple para describir la relación entre el desgaste del flanco, el tiempo de corte principal y el avance de corte para cada velocidad e inserto utilizados en el estudio.…”
Section: Análisis De Varianza Y De Regresión Múlti-pleunclassified