2019
DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2019.1677160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimization approach for deployment of intelligent transportation systems wrong-way driving countermeasures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study in Florida by the authors of this paper found that RFBs on Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX) toll roads have caused over 83% of detected wrong-way vehicles to turn around and could provide between $26.5 and $40 million in injury savings over their 10-year life cycle (17). Other Florida studies on rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) in Tampa and RFBs on FTE ramps found similar turnaround results (6,7,18). Studies of Florida LED WWD countermeasures found that they have much lower turnaround percentages than RFBs, but can reduce WWD 911 calls and citations by up to 48% (5,6).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A study in Florida by the authors of this paper found that RFBs on Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX) toll roads have caused over 83% of detected wrong-way vehicles to turn around and could provide between $26.5 and $40 million in injury savings over their 10-year life cycle (17). Other Florida studies on rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) in Tampa and RFBs on FTE ramps found similar turnaround results (6,7,18). Studies of Florida LED WWD countermeasures found that they have much lower turnaround percentages than RFBs, but can reduce WWD 911 calls and citations by up to 48% (5,6).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In Equation 4, it is assumed that countermeasures are installed at all ramps at an exit, since it is unknown which ramp will experience more WWD at exits with multiple ramps. The WWCR k values can be determined using the WWCR segment modeling methodology discussed by Sandt and Al-Deek (7). Adding the predicted values from the model to the actual number of crashes in each segment provides a WWCR k value for each segment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…of events is a good threshold for determining the segment size. A similar analysis using data from 2006 through 2016 showed that 95% of vehicles traveled five or less exits (5,6). This indicates that the chosen number of exits per segment can vary depending on the data.…”
Section: Data Description and Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%