2009
DOI: 10.1080/10170660909509123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Optimal Policy for CSP-1 With Inspection Errors and Return Cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, according to Equations (16) and (19), Finally, by Equations (11), (12), (17), and (19), we can obtain…”
Section: Appendix: the Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, according to Equations (16) and (19), Finally, by Equations (11), (12), (17), and (19), we can obtain…”
Section: Appendix: the Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Their results showed that, depending on the defective fraction of the production process, the unit rework cost, the return cost, and the unit inspection cost, there are only three different optimal policies: (1) the number of consecutive inspections is zero (partial inspection), (2) the number of consecutive inspections is infinity (100% inspection) in CSP-1, or (3) the number of consecutive inspections can be any value from zero to infinity. With respect to CSP-1, with inspection errors and return cost, Lin and Yu [12] determined the optimal inspection policy for minimizing the long-run average unit cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%