1990
DOI: 10.1109/60.50806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimal multivariable stabilizer for a multimachine plant

Abstract: Table of contents iv List of figures vi List of tables Principal symbols xi 10 2.2 The Heffron-Phillips Model for a Single-Machine Plant 2.3 Generalized Heffron-Phillips Model for a Multimachine Plant 18 2.4 Including the AVR's in the Generalized Heffron-Phillips Model 28 2.5 The Data of a Three Machine Plant and Its Model 31 3. OPTIMAL CONTROLLER DESIGN 38 3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When performance is in the permanent state, if a sudden change happens, the system will go toward the disturbance. Investigation of the classic stability [5], the optimization method with the help of pareto multiobjective [6], the method of adaptive control [7], the nonlinear controller [8], using the parameters estimation [9], robust controller H2/H ∞ [10], the pole placement and application of the linear matrix inequality [11], fuzzy and Neural network control [12], and Evolutionary algorithm [13] are among the works which had been done. The problem of closed-loop identification of the Heffron-Phillips model parameters is of practical importance since the data used for identification can be gathered when the machine is normally connected to the power system [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When performance is in the permanent state, if a sudden change happens, the system will go toward the disturbance. Investigation of the classic stability [5], the optimization method with the help of pareto multiobjective [6], the method of adaptive control [7], the nonlinear controller [8], using the parameters estimation [9], robust controller H2/H ∞ [10], the pole placement and application of the linear matrix inequality [11], fuzzy and Neural network control [12], and Evolutionary algorithm [13] are among the works which had been done. The problem of closed-loop identification of the Heffron-Phillips model parameters is of practical importance since the data used for identification can be gathered when the machine is normally connected to the power system [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, selection of correct and adequate values is so vital. Since 1981, several approaches have been proposed for determining PSS controller's parameters in order to oscillation damping in power systems, such as artificial neural network, Pole placement, optimal control, adaptive control and variable structure control based on modern control theory [9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the restrictive assumptions made and to the intuitive nature of the design process. In an attempt to address this problem, a number of researchers have proposed nonconventional design techniques based on modern control theory, such as eigenvalue assignment [S, 9, 12, 131, Nyquist array 114-161, and optimal control [7,[17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, reports have appeared in the literature concerning the application of optimal LQR theory to the design of power system stabilisers (PSSs) [7,[17][18][19][20][21][22]. The early papers considered single machine infinite bus (SMIB) systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%