2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/iros47612.2022.9981642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Optimal Motion Planning Framework for Quadruped Jumping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Model-based optimal control for legged jumping: Prior model-based methods for legged jumping control usually build up a layered optimization scheme, which includes offline trajectory optimization with detailed models of the robot's dynamics and ground contacts [15], [19]- [21], and online controllers that leverage simplified models of the robot's dynamics [6], [22]- [24]. In order to optimize trajectories for jumping, which needs to switch among modes with different underlying dynamics, there are two commonly employed solutions: relying on human-tuned predefined contact sequences [5], [12], [14], [25], [26], which is not scalable to different jump distances and/or directions, or leveraging contact-implicit optimization [3], [27]- [30] which plans through contacts to avoid breaking the trajectory or using computationally expensive mixed-integer programming [20], [31], [32].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Model-based optimal control for legged jumping: Prior model-based methods for legged jumping control usually build up a layered optimization scheme, which includes offline trajectory optimization with detailed models of the robot's dynamics and ground contacts [15], [19]- [21], and online controllers that leverage simplified models of the robot's dynamics [6], [22]- [24]. In order to optimize trajectories for jumping, which needs to switch among modes with different underlying dynamics, there are two commonly employed solutions: relying on human-tuned predefined contact sequences [5], [12], [14], [25], [26], which is not scalable to different jump distances and/or directions, or leveraging contact-implicit optimization [3], [27]- [30] which plans through contacts to avoid breaking the trajectory or using computationally expensive mixed-integer programming [20], [31], [32].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Model-based optimal control for legged jumping: Prior model-based methods for legged jumping control usually build up a layered optimization scheme, which includes offline trajectory optimization with detailed models of the robot's dynamics and ground contacts [10,12,46,63], and online controllers that leverage simplified models of the robot's dynamics [45,55,65,72]. In order to optimize trajectories for jumping, which needs to switch among modes with different underlying dynamics, there are two commonly employed solutions: (i) relying on human-specified contact sequences [9,19,29,47,71], which is not scalable to different jump distances and/or directions, or (ii) leveraging contactimplicit optimization [8,14,33,52,77] which plans through contacts to avoid breaking the trajectory or using computationally expensive mixed-integer programming [1,11,12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demand for adaptation to complex environments presents challenges for both the stability and agility of quadruped robots. Highly dynamic jumping can deal with a variety of complex environments to improve quadruped robots’ agility [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Jumping behavior requires high speeds to be attained in a short time, which is associated with challenges related to physical constraints such as joint configuration and the friction cone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%