2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10817-006-9051-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Optimal Decision Procedure for Right Propositional Neighborhood Logic

Abstract: Propositional interval temporal logics are quite expressive temporal logics that allow one to naturally express statements that refer to time intervals. Unfortunately, most such logics turn out to be (highly) undecidable. In order to get decidability, severe syntactic or semantic restrictions have been imposed to interval-based temporal logics to reduce them to point-based ones. The problem of identifying expressive enough, yet decidable, new interval logics or fragments of existing ones that are genuinely int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technical level required to understand such results is not trivial and involves the knowledge of model theory, complexity theory, and terminating and nonterminating tableaux, among others. For the interested reader, we give here three representative examples: the first one is the maximal incomplete and minimal complete sets of first-order interval relations in the class of all linearly ordered sets (Table 2), known from [35], the second one is the undecidability of full HS (a result known since [37], but presented here is a novel and simpler form), and the third one is the decidability of A (known since [44]). In the latter two cases, we focus our attention on the finite case, for the sake of simplicity.…”
Section: Addendum: Some Technical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The technical level required to understand such results is not trivial and involves the knowledge of model theory, complexity theory, and terminating and nonterminating tableaux, among others. For the interested reader, we give here three representative examples: the first one is the maximal incomplete and minimal complete sets of first-order interval relations in the class of all linearly ordered sets (Table 2), known from [35], the second one is the undecidability of full HS (a result known since [37], but presented here is a novel and simpler form), and the third one is the decidability of A (known since [44]). In the latter two cases, we focus our attention on the finite case, for the sake of simplicity.…”
Section: Addendum: Some Technical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NEXPTIMEmembership of AA has been proved in [27]. NEXPTIMEhardness of A, shown in [44], holds also for the class…”
Section: Nexptime/expspace-completenessmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using a technique similar to the one which can be found in [BMG06], it is possible to prove that τ (f ) is satisfiable over upright local SpPNL-models if and only if f is satisfiable, by providing a suitable translation between Compass Logic models and upright local SpPNL-models, and vice versa (notice that the universal operator is definable in SpPNL, as we will see in the Section 5).…”
Section: Lemma 1 Given a Sppnl-model M And A Finite Set Of Propositiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long time, such sweeping undecidability results have discouraged attempts for practical applications and further research on interval logics. A renewed interest in the area has been recently stimulated by the discovery of some interesting decidable fragments of HS [7,8,9,12,13]. As an effect, the identification of expressive enough, yet decidable, fragments of HS has become one of the major topics of the current research agenda in interval temporal logics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%