2017
DOI: 10.1080/13873954.2017.1338300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimal data assimilation method and its application to the numerical simulation of the ocean dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
11
0
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…are the model fields (written in the form of a column bit vector in each grid point) after and before correction, i.e., the analysis and background fields, respectively; Y is the vector of observations, in our case, it is the temperature and salinity vector at the point of observation; K is the Kalman gain (the weighting matrix) whose meaning is to render information about the difference between the observed and model values, i.e., the errors of modeling, to the model itself including unobserved model parameters; Q is the model error covariance matrix determined only for the observed parameters (structurally, this is a positively definite symmetrical matrix); Λ and С are temporal trends, i.e., the time derivatives of model and observational parameters, respectively, written as column bit vectors at the grid points; H is the matrix of the linear projection operator from the phase space (set of values) of the model onto the phase space of observations, which interpolates the values of the model to the points of observations and exclude from consideration the unobserved model parameters; the upper index T designates the transposition of a vector and/or a matrix. The GKF method (1)-(3) is described in detail and theoretically substantiated in [15,16]. It is also shown in these papers that this method generalizes the known Kalman algorithm EnKF [12].…”
Section: Data Assimilation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…are the model fields (written in the form of a column bit vector in each grid point) after and before correction, i.e., the analysis and background fields, respectively; Y is the vector of observations, in our case, it is the temperature and salinity vector at the point of observation; K is the Kalman gain (the weighting matrix) whose meaning is to render information about the difference between the observed and model values, i.e., the errors of modeling, to the model itself including unobserved model parameters; Q is the model error covariance matrix determined only for the observed parameters (structurally, this is a positively definite symmetrical matrix); Λ and С are temporal trends, i.e., the time derivatives of model and observational parameters, respectively, written as column bit vectors at the grid points; H is the matrix of the linear projection operator from the phase space (set of values) of the model onto the phase space of observations, which interpolates the values of the model to the points of observations and exclude from consideration the unobserved model parameters; the upper index T designates the transposition of a vector and/or a matrix. The GKF method (1)-(3) is described in detail and theoretically substantiated in [15,16]. It is also shown in these papers that this method generalizes the known Kalman algorithm EnKF [12].…”
Section: Data Assimilation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also shown in these papers that this method generalizes the known Kalman algorithm EnKF [12]. The values of the vector С and matrix Q are considered to be known and are determined, in particular, by the methods described in [15]. The advantages of this algorithm are as follows: it considers not only the difference between the model and observations, but also the temporal trend (the time derivative) in both the model and observation data.…”
Section: Data Assimilation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ODA methods can be conditionally divided into variational methods based on minimizing a functional given [4][5][6][7], which are formulated as optimal control problems and the theory of conjugate equations, and dynamic-stochastic ones, based on probability theory and filtering methods [8][9][10][11]. The history of the variational method dates back to the 70s of the 20 th century, when Guriy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Кроме указанных основных подходов АДН есть также и ряд гибридных методов, сочетающих оба вышеприведенных подхода. К этим методам можно, например, отнести авторскую схему АДН [19], в которой минимизируется функционал, построенный по динамико-стохастической схеме.…”
unclassified