1973
DOI: 10.1037/h0034534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An opponent-process theory of motivation: II. Cigarette addiction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

16
179
2
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
16
179
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibitory modulation of affective reactions demonstrated in the present study is consistent with opponent processes theories of inhibitory learning (Dickinson & Dearing, 1979;Konorski, 1948;1967;Solomon & Corbit, 1978) based on the observation of approachwithdrawal reactions (Hearst et al, 1980;Hearst & Franklin, 1977;Wasserman et al, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inhibitory modulation of affective reactions demonstrated in the present study is consistent with opponent processes theories of inhibitory learning (Dickinson & Dearing, 1979;Konorski, 1948;1967;Solomon & Corbit, 1978) based on the observation of approachwithdrawal reactions (Hearst et al, 1980;Hearst & Franklin, 1977;Wasserman et al, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These direct behavioural tests of conditioned inhibition are unlikely to be confounded by attentional processes and yield results consistent with opponent processes theories of inhibitory learning (Dickinson & Dearing, 1979;Konorski, 1948;1967;Solomon & Corbit, 1978). For example, a subject will approach a CS+ for an appetitive outcome such as food.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This theory postulates that the initial effects of the drug are opposed or counteracted by homeostatic changes in systems that mediate primary drug effects (Solomon and Corbit, 1974;Siegel, 1975). These neurobiological changes occur within the system that directly mediates the acute action of the drug or involve other systems that are recruited during chronic drug administration and are revealed at the cessation of the treatments (Koob and Le Moal, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hedonic tone is an important [Engel, 1977;Solomon, 1974;Stolerman, 19921, but not exclusive [Wise and Bozarth, 19871, facet of reinforcement since many drugs of abuse are dysphoric on first presentation yet self-administration continues. In animals, it has been suggested that positive hedonic tone increases the strength of reinforcement and sensitivity to the effects of the reinforcer (in this case, alcohol); anhedonia has the opposite consequence [Solomon and Corbitt, 1974;Carr et al, 1989;Stolerman, 1992;Papp et al, 1992; W i h e r et al, 19921. For example, animals exposed to chronic mild stress (CM S)-which produces a model of anhedonia-show reduced sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of the D,/D, agonist quinpirole [Willner et al, 19921.…”
Section: Stimulation Of Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine Release By Drugs Omentioning
confidence: 99%