2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An operational method for the real-time monitoring of E. coli numbers in bathing waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…CV decreased from 15.6% at the lowest E. coli MPN (624) to 2.6% for the highest E. coli MPN (14,136). These figures agree with the work of Lebaron who in a much more extensive study using the discontinuous 4-MUG method for measuring GUS activity reported CVs less than 15% [25]. By comparison, culture based MPN methods typically report CVs of 15% to 30% [32].…”
Section: Field Trialsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CV decreased from 15.6% at the lowest E. coli MPN (624) to 2.6% for the highest E. coli MPN (14,136). These figures agree with the work of Lebaron who in a much more extensive study using the discontinuous 4-MUG method for measuring GUS activity reported CVs less than 15% [25]. By comparison, culture based MPN methods typically report CVs of 15% to 30% [32].…”
Section: Field Trialsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2d. The system featured three sample chambers for performing assays in triplicate as recommended by Lebaron due to the high Coefficient of Variance (CV) (15%) of enzymatic methods [25]. Each chamber was set to incubate at 44 °C and control to within 0.5 °C.…”
Section: Prototype Design and Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The direct measurement of b-D-galactosidase or b-D-glucuronidase activity with fluorogenic substrates has been used as rapid surrogate parameters for estimating the level of coliform bacteria and E. coli in water samples. Some studies (Caruso et al 2002;Lebaron et al 2005) showed that microbial assessments of water given by this method and the ISO standard methods were in relatively good agreement for quantification of E. coli in marine waters. However, the enzymatic results were somewhat higher than those from the cultural procedure.…”
Section: Enzymatic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…They are capable of aerobic and facultative anaerobic growth. They ferment lactose with gas production at 35°C within 48 h and are b-galactosidase positive (Lebaron et al 2005). While some members of the coliform group are common in the intestinal tract of mammals and birds (e.g., E. coli), others occur in soil and on the surface of plants (e.g., Klebsiella, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae) and are not directly associated with fecal contamination.…”
Section: Conventional Indicators Of Fecal Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%