An openEHR based approach to improve the semantic interoperability of clinical data registry

Abstract

BackgroundClinical data registry is designed to collect and manage information about the practices and outcomes of a patient population for improving the quality and safety of care and facilitating novel researches. Semantic interoperability is a challenge when integrating the data from more than one clinical data registry. The openEHR approach can represent the information and knowledge semantics by multi-level modeling, and it advocates the use of collaborative modeling to facilitate reusing existing archetypes with consistent semantics so as to be a potential solution to improve the semantic interoperability.MethodsThis paper proposed an openEHR based approach to improve the semantic interoperability of clinical data registry. The approach consists of five steps: clinical data registry meta-information collection, data element definition, archetype modeling, template editing, and implementation. Through collaborative modeling and maximum reusing of existing archetype at the archetype modeling step, the approach can improve semantic interoperability. To verify the feasibility of the approach, this paper conducted a case study of building a Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) registry that can interoperate with an existing Electronic Health Record (EHR) system.ResultsThe CCTA registry includes 183 data elements, which involves 20 archetypes. A total number of 45 CCTA data elements and EHR data elements have semantic overlap. Among them, 38 (84%) CCTA data elements can be found in the 10 reused EHR archetypes. These corresponding clinical data can be collected from the EHR system directly without transformation. The other 7 (16%) CCTA data elements correspond to one coarse-grained EHR data elements, and these clinical data can be collected with mapping rules. The results show that the approach can improve semantic interoperability of clinical data registry.ConclusionsUsing an openEHR based approach to develop clinical data registry can improve the semantic interoperability. Meanwhile, some challenges for broader semantic interoperability are identified, including domain experts’ involvement, archetype sharing and reusing, and archetype semantic mapping. Collaborative modeling, easy-to-use tools, and semantic relationship establishment are potential solutions for these challenges. This study provides some experience and insight about clinical modeling and clinical data registry development.

Nutrition Information in Oncology — Extending the Electronic Patient-Record Data Set

“…This study focused on describing the development process of openEHR archetype-based structures, used to represent cancer clinical statements proposing nutritional care. These archetypes can be used to improve EHR interoperability [40]. Some authors have suggested that EHRs have a strong potential to improve cancer outcome research [41] and patient care [42,43].…”

“…This study focused on describing the development process of openEHR archetype-based structures, used to represent cancer clinical statements proposing nutritional care. These archetypes can be used to improve EHR interoperability [ 40 ].…”

Discovering Clinical Information Models Online to Promote Interoperability of Electronic Health Records: A Feasibility Study of OpenEHR

“…Additionally, better retrieval results could help users to identify reusable archetypes quickly, promote reuse of archetypes, and improve standardization of CIMs, thereby enhancing interoperability of EHRs. Archetype modeling methodology [15,23] showed that clinicians and domain experts should compare archetype design specifications with retrieved archetypes to decide whether new archetypes need to be developed or whether an existing one could be adapted. Our method could successfully identify relevant archetypes that the CKM could not find, such as “openEHR-EHR- SECTION.problems_and_diagnoses.v1” in the diagnosis retrieval task.…”

Semantic Interoperability for Development of Future Health Care: A Systematic Review of Different Technologies

“…The stockholders of health systems include clinicians, healthcare organizations, patients, device, or manufacturers. Establishment of semantic interoperability needs the involvement of all stockholders [20,21].…”