2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open-source Abaqus implementation of the phase-field method to study the effect of plasticity on the instantaneous fracture toughness in dynamic crack propagation

Abstract: Brittle and ductile dynamic fracture in solids is a complex mechanical phenomenon which attracted much attention from both engineers and scientists due to its technological interests. Modeling cracks in dynamic cases based on a discontinuous description is difficult because it needs additional criteria for branching and widening. Due to the very short time scales and the spatial complexity of the dynamic problem, its experimental analysis is still very difficult. Therefore, researchers still have to rely on nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(158 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of its major flaws is that due to the quadratic setting it does not have an initial elastic threshold. Some authors tried to correct this flaw by adding an initial elastic threshold (Miehe et al, 2016;Molnár et al, 2020;Wu and Huang, 2020), however in all of the cases the crack surface calculated from the damage topology overestimates the theoretical value by more than 20%, which makes this method somewhat unreliable. On the other hand Pham et al (2011) proposed a description with the damage variable entering the surface only with a linear term.…”
Section: Phase-field Approach For Brittle Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of its major flaws is that due to the quadratic setting it does not have an initial elastic threshold. Some authors tried to correct this flaw by adding an initial elastic threshold (Miehe et al, 2016;Molnár et al, 2020;Wu and Huang, 2020), however in all of the cases the crack surface calculated from the damage topology overestimates the theoretical value by more than 20%, which makes this method somewhat unreliable. On the other hand Pham et al (2011) proposed a description with the damage variable entering the surface only with a linear term.…”
Section: Phase-field Approach For Brittle Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there are other methods to obtain a positive damage rate (e.g., bound constrained non-linear optimization techniques (Amor et al, 2009;Farrell and Maurini, 2017;Wu, 2018b), augmented Lagrangian (Lorentz and Godard, 2011;Wheeler et al, 2014) or penalization methods (Gerasimov and Lorenzis, 2019)), due to its simplicity the history field of Miehe et al (2010b) is the most frequently used (Wu and Huang, 2020). More details about the Abaqus implementation can be found in our previous papers (Molnár and Gravouil, 2017;Molnár et al, 2020).…”
Section: Phase-field Approach For Brittle Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These works have been aimed at both commercial finite element packages, such as COMSOL [ 30 ], and open-source platforms like FEniCS [ 31 ]. The development of phase field fracture implementations in the commercial package Abaqus has received particular attention [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ], due to its popularity in the solid mechanics community. However, these works require the use of multiple user subroutines, most often including a user element (UEL) subroutine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumbhar et al [6] implemented the element based smoothed finite element method (CSFEM) by the UEL subroutines. Molnar et al [31] implemented an implicit, staggered elastoplastic version of the phase-field approach Abaqus through the UEL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%