An open randomized controlled trial of median sternotomy versus anterolateral left thoracotomy on morbidity and health care resource use in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: The Sternotomy Versus Thoracotomy (STET) trial

Rogers, Chris; Pike, Katie; Angelini, Gianni; Reeves, Barnaby C; Glauber, Mattia; Ferrarini, Matteo; Murphy, Gavin J.

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.04.020

Cited by 56 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…RA-MIDCAB entails a shorter intubation time and a shorter stay at post-operative care units, with more patients transferred post-operatively to the PACU (fast-track treatment). These findings are in line with previous studies [26,27]. Hospital length of stay (LOS), however, showed no significant difference between the two study groups.…”

Section: Comparison Of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Coronary Asupporting

confidence: 92%

Assessment of Physical Activity by Wearable Technology During Rehabilitation After Cardiac Surgery: Explorative Prospective Monocentric Observational Cohort Study (Preprint)

Thijs¹,

Fresiello²,

Oosterlinck³

et al. 2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Coronary Asupporting

confidence: 92%

Assessment of Physical Activity by Wearable Technology During Rehabilitation After Cardiac Surgery: Explorative Prospective Monocentric Observational Cohort Study (Preprint)

Thijs¹,

Fresiello²,

Oosterlinck³

et al. 2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the assumption that there would be a moderate correlation of 0.7 between pre-and post-intervention measures and between repeated post-intervention measures, as observed in previous work, 267 and on the basis that there would be one baseline and five postoperative measures, we estimated that a sample size of 150 patients would enable us to detect a small to moderate target difference between groups of 0.4, with 90% power and 5% significance (two-tailed). We aimed to recruit 170 participants (85 per group), assuming an attrition rate of between 10% and 15% for incomplete sampling, participant death and withdrawal.…”

Section: Sample Size Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…We therefore estimated that a sample size of 60 participants would be able to provide insight into the process underlying measured differences in the primary or other clinical outcomes, as was our experience previously. 267 …”

Section: Sample Size Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Diagnostic and therapeutic medical devices for safer blood management in cardiac surgery: systematic reviews, observational studies and randomised controlled trials

Murphy

Mumford

Rogers

et al. 2017

Programme Grants Appl Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report should be referenced as follows:Murphy GJ, Mumford AD, Rogers CA, Wordsworth S, Stokes EA, Verheyden V, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic medical devices for safer blood management in cardiac surgery: systematic reviews, observational studies and randomised controlled trials. Programme Grants Appl Res 2017;5(17). Programme Grants for Applied ResearchISSN 2050-4322 (Print) ISSN 2050-4330 (Online) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: journals.library@nihr.ac.ukThe full PGfAR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/pgfar. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Programme Grants for Applied Research journalReports are published in Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PGfAR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. Programme Grants for Applied Research programmeThe Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 2006 to produce independent research findings that will have practical application for the benefit of patients and the NHS in the relatively near future. The Programme is managed by the NIHR Central Commissioning Facility (CCF) with strategic input from the Programme Director.The programme is a national response mode funding scheme that aims to provide evidence to improve health outcomes in England through promotion of health, prevention of ill health, and optimal disease management (including safety and quality), with particular emphasis on conditions causing significant disease burden.For more information about the PGfAR programme please visit the website: http://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding/programme-grants-forapplied-research.htm This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by PGfAR as project number RP-PG-0407-10384. The contractual start date was in July 2008. The final report began editorial review in July 2016 and was accepted for publication in April 2017. As the funder, the PGfAR programme agreed the research questions and study designs in advance with the investigators. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PGfAR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not ...

show abstract

“…Studies that evaluated the circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL‐6, ‐8, and ‐10) after off‐ and on‐pump‐ surgery reported contradictory results 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22…”

Section: Differences In Systemic Inflammatory Reaction and Platelet/cmentioning

confidence: 99%

Off‐Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: 30 Years of Debate

Gaudino

Angelini

Antoniades

et al. 2018

JAHA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An open randomized controlled trial of median sternotomy versus anterolateral left thoracotomy on morbidity and health care resource use in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: The Sternotomy Versus Thoracotomy (STET) trial

Cited by 56 publications

References 32 publications

Assessment of Physical Activity by Wearable Technology During Rehabilitation After Cardiac Surgery: Explorative Prospective Monocentric Observational Cohort Study (Preprint)

Assessment of Physical Activity by Wearable Technology During Rehabilitation After Cardiac Surgery: Explorative Prospective Monocentric Observational Cohort Study (Preprint)

Diagnostic and therapeutic medical devices for safer blood management in cardiac surgery: systematic reviews, observational studies and randomised controlled trials

Off‐Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: 30 Years of Debate

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About