2011
DOI: 10.1097/bcr.0b013e318236fe31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Open, Parallel, Randomized, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness, Performance, Tolerance, and Safety of a Silver-Containing Soft Silicone Foam Dressing (Intervention) vs Silver Sulfadiazine Cream

Abstract: An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study was implemented to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing (Mepilex Ag) vs silver sulfadiazine cream (control) in the treatment of partial-thickness thermal burns. Individuals aged 5 years and older with partial-thickness thermal burns (2.5-20% BSA) were randomized into two groups and treated with the trial products for 21 days or until healed, whichever occurred first. D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This material readily adheres to intact dry skin, but will remain in situ on the surface of a moist wound or damaged surrounding skin without adhering to fragile tissue. 34 Consequently, these dressings can be applied and reapplied without damaging the wound or stripping the epidermis in the periwound region (even in critical situations when exudate starts to dry out), 35 and will also minimise pain and psychological stress at dressing change. 36 The gentle but effective seal that forms between the intact skin and a dressing with Safetac inhibits the movement of exudate from the wound onto the periwound skin, helping to prevent moisture-related damage, such as maceration, to this region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This material readily adheres to intact dry skin, but will remain in situ on the surface of a moist wound or damaged surrounding skin without adhering to fragile tissue. 34 Consequently, these dressings can be applied and reapplied without damaging the wound or stripping the epidermis in the periwound region (even in critical situations when exudate starts to dry out), 35 and will also minimise pain and psychological stress at dressing change. 36 The gentle but effective seal that forms between the intact skin and a dressing with Safetac inhibits the movement of exudate from the wound onto the periwound skin, helping to prevent moisture-related damage, such as maceration, to this region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is unclear if these findings are generalizable to humans whose burns generally have more exudate than porcine burns, which would reduce or prevent desiccation under the foam dressing. Indeed, a recent human study by Silverstein et al 18 concluded that the same silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing that was used in our study (Mepilex Ag) was as effective in the treatment of patients as standard care (SSD). In addition, the group of patients treated with the soft silicone foam dressing demonstrated decreased pain and lower costs associated with treatment.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such dressings are also made to be left on the burn wound and changed every 3 to 5 days or more often if soiled. 19 The dressing is lifted off of the burn wound to enable wound assessment for healing or infection as needed and then placed back over the wound and re-secured in place with an outer dressing or adhesive. These types of dressings obviate the need for the more time-consuming and more frequent application of topical ointment over large burn wounds.…”
Section: Standard Management Of Traumatic Woundsmentioning
confidence: 99%