2009
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Open-Label Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study Shows Very Rapid Remission of Ulcerative Colitis by Intensive Granulocyte and Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis as Compared With Routine Weekly Treatment

Abstract: Intensive GMA in patients with active UC seems to be more efficacious than weekly treatment, and significantly reduced the patients' morbidity time without increasing the incidence of side effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
115
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
115
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both reports state that, at entry, candidate patients should have a fair level of intact mucosal tissue; patients who have extensive and deep colonic lesions are not likely to benefit, while the best responders appeared to be the first-episode cases followed by steroid-naive patients. Further, Sakuraba et al [51] reported that intensive GMA (two sessions per week) was superior to weekly GMA both in efficacy rate and time to clinical remission. The report by Tanaka et al [61] is the most thorough so far on identifying the responders and non-responders to GMA.…”
Section: Clinical Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both reports state that, at entry, candidate patients should have a fair level of intact mucosal tissue; patients who have extensive and deep colonic lesions are not likely to benefit, while the best responders appeared to be the first-episode cases followed by steroid-naive patients. Further, Sakuraba et al [51] reported that intensive GMA (two sessions per week) was superior to weekly GMA both in efficacy rate and time to clinical remission. The report by Tanaka et al [61] is the most thorough so far on identifying the responders and non-responders to GMA.…”
Section: Clinical Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been a large number of reports from Japan [4,18,45,[48][49][50][51], as well as from Europe [46,[52][53][54][55][56] and the United States [57][58][59][60] on the efficacy of GMA in IBD. The clinical data show that GMA in patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory UC was associated with significant clinical efficacy and corticosteroid tapering.…”
Section: Clinical Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Several previous studies reported achieving a high remission rate in patients with active UC following GMAA therapy, and Sakuraba's group and our data suggest that intensive GMAA (twice per week) induces higher clinical and endoscopic remission compared with weekly GMAA. 18,19 In addition, our recent data and previous case series revealed that GMAA could be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with active UC prior to starting corticosteroid (CS) therapy because of a striking difference in the clinical response to GMAA between steroid-naïve and steroid-dependent patients. [19][20][21] Furthermore, it was recently reported that GMAA could be safe for UC patients with a history of CMV infection due to the avoidance of colonic CMV reactivation compared with UC patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also encountered a patient with CD accompanied by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who we successfully treated with a combination of intensive GMA and ADA (2). Intensive GMA at a rate of two GMA sessions per week has been recently shown to be more effective than conventional weekly GMA therapy for the treatment of patients with refractory UC (26). However, the safety of GMA during pregnancy remains unclear in patients with IBD because there are no meta-analysis reports of exposure to GMA during pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%