Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open-label evaluation of safety and tolerability of coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide for post-exposure prophylaxis following potential exposure to human immunodeficiency virus-1

Abstract: Background: Single-tablet regimen (STR) provides a convenient once-daily regimen for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Here, we investigated the safety and tolerability of coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) as a three-drug, STR for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in Chinese individuals. Methods: This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm trial conducted in a sexually transmitted diseases and acqui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further extending this comparative analysis, recent single-arm studies using bictegravir offer additional insight. One of these studies involved 52 individuals and compared the outcomes to historical treatments [ 31 ], while another study included 102 participants but lacked a comparison group [ 32 ]. Although both studies yielded important results, their relatively limited sample sizes might have prevented the detection of subtle variances or infrequent adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further extending this comparative analysis, recent single-arm studies using bictegravir offer additional insight. One of these studies involved 52 individuals and compared the outcomes to historical treatments [ 31 ], while another study included 102 participants but lacked a comparison group [ 32 ]. Although both studies yielded important results, their relatively limited sample sizes might have prevented the detection of subtle variances or infrequent adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, at the 2022 International AIDS Conference, researchers shared results from a second open-label phase 4 clinical trial. 28 Similarly, this study assessed people receiving B/F/TAF in an STD/AIDS clinic in Beijing, China, for PEP for persons with potential sexual exposure to HIV. A larger cohort of 112 participants was enrolled, and adherence was reported to be >98% based on both participant reporting and pill counts.…”
Section: Treatment-experiencedmentioning
confidence: 99%