2018
DOI: 10.1166/jmihi.2018.2442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Open Access Database for Evaluating the Algorithms of Electrocardiogram Rhythm and Morphology Abnormality Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
211
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
211
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Training data were from the 2018 China physiological signal challenge (CSPC-2018) [11] and test data were recorded from a newly developed 12-lead Lenovo Smart ECG vest [12]. All recordings were intercepted the only first 10-s segments.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training data were from the 2018 China physiological signal challenge (CSPC-2018) [11] and test data were recorded from a newly developed 12-lead Lenovo Smart ECG vest [12]. All recordings were intercepted the only first 10-s segments.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some papers, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is fixed at a certain number of decibels, which is convenient for comparison, but it is difficult to represent the generalization performance of the proposed method. The ground-truth ECG used in this article was derived from ICBEB 2018 [19], and 1,379 high-quality single-lead signals were manually selected from the competition dataset by trained volunteers. These data came from different, random leads in the standard 12-lead ECG.…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset is from the China Physiological Signal Challenge 2018 [11]. The ECG recordings were collected from 11 hospitals.…”
Section: Dataset Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method can deal with variable-length ECG without any segmentation or padding process. The method is evaluated on the dataset of the China Physiological Signal Challenge 2018 [11], which contains multiple abnormalities such as Atrial fibrillation and Premature ventricular contraction. Our method achieves an average F1-score of 0.889 over 5-fold cross validation, exceeding state-of-the-art methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%