2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39630-9_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ontology Supporting Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Method Selection

Abstract: In the last few years multiple-criteria decision analysis methods (MCDA) have received more and more attention from researchers. Consequently, the new methods have made it possible to solve a lot of real-world decision problems in the areas of private lives, management practice or science. However, proper selection of a MCDA method reflecting a decision problem and a decision-maker's preferences is a complex and important issue and inappropriate selection of a MCDA method may lead to generating improper recomm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Searching for universal indicators based on the amount of time allocated to developing software did not bring the expected results [21] even though there were many attempts to include these factors into the standards of IT systems' evaluation, at least in terms of the assessment of software itself, not its application. It is currently believed that the method of solving this problem should rather be adapted to the decision-making situation [22]. It is important to note that the situation regarding the assessment of online tools is not very different in this respect.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Searching for universal indicators based on the amount of time allocated to developing software did not bring the expected results [21] even though there were many attempts to include these factors into the standards of IT systems' evaluation, at least in terms of the assessment of software itself, not its application. It is currently believed that the method of solving this problem should rather be adapted to the decision-making situation [22]. It is important to note that the situation regarding the assessment of online tools is not very different in this respect.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%