2016
DOI: 10.14257/ijunesst.2016.9.1.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ontology Model for Smart Service in Vertical Farms – An OWL-S Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their research concentrates more on the monitoring and controlling of the internal and external environment parameters. This work was extended to link VFO with web services aiming to assist different entities related to hardware, user, service, and environmental factors [48]. In the study by Kim et al, an ontology using context modeling technique is designed for an intelligent service in a vertical farm by integrating several environmental and control factors, which were validated for different scenarios [49].…”
Section: Agricultural Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their research concentrates more on the monitoring and controlling of the internal and external environment parameters. This work was extended to link VFO with web services aiming to assist different entities related to hardware, user, service, and environmental factors [48]. In the study by Kim et al, an ontology using context modeling technique is designed for an intelligent service in a vertical farm by integrating several environmental and control factors, which were validated for different scenarios [49].…”
Section: Agricultural Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [8] extended their work on vertical farming ontologies aided by web services through OWL-S approach which integrates various web services. OWL-S consists of three subclasses (i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vocabulary of the CSA domain was constructed by reading related literature on CSA from websites ("Climate-Smart Agriculture", n.d.; Papuso & Faraby, 2013;FAO, 2017), published research articles and reports (Smith & Gregory, 2012;Lipper et al, 2014;Amin et al, 2015;FISH, 2016;FAO, 2018a;Raza et al, 2019) and analyzing existing related agricultural ontologies (Hu et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2013;Dineshkumar et al, 2014;Harika & Bhargav, 2015;Sivamani et al, 2016;Ngo et al, 2018). Furthermore, lists of competency questions (CQs) and role players involved in CSA were drawn to delimit the scope of the target OntoCSA ontology.…”
Section: Building the Vocabulary Of The Csa Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is witnessed in recent reviews of the use of semantic technologies in agriculture (Jebaraj & Sathiaseelan, 2017;Drury et al, 2019) and a recent review and evaluation of existing agricultural ontologies (Goldstein et al, 2019). Many studies have specifically reported on the use of ontologies in agriculture (Hu et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2013;Dineshkumar et al, 2014;Harika & Bhargav, 2015;Sivamani et al, 2016;Jebaraj & Sathiaseelan, 2017;Ngo et al, 2018;Goldstein et al, 2019;Nidhi et al, 2021;Jachimczyk et al, 2021) and climate change (Diop & Lo, 2013;Pileggi & Lamia, 2020) domains. Kim et al (2013), Harika and Bhargav (2015) and Sivamani et al (2016) developed context aware ontologies for seamless services access in vertical farming.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation