2016
DOI: 10.5463/dcid.v27i2.565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Online Survey on Identification of Evaluation Capacity, Needs and Current Practice of Programme Evaluation in Community-based Rehabilitation

Abstract: Purpose: Evaluation of Community-based Rehabilitation (CBR) is important

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the evolution of CBR evaluation, evidence of its impact remains sparse [10], and does not address the important issue of whether CBR contributes to change [11]. There is a need to explore evaluation methodologies that address the effect of CBR at the individual, family and community level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the evolution of CBR evaluation, evidence of its impact remains sparse [10], and does not address the important issue of whether CBR contributes to change [11]. There is a need to explore evaluation methodologies that address the effect of CBR at the individual, family and community level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant body of literature emphasizes the significance of monitoring and evaluation of CBR programs (Hartley et al, 2009;Grandisson et al, 2014Grandisson et al, , 2017Madden et al, 2015;Weber et al, 2016). Other studies focus more on rigorous evaluation of content and methods whilst another body places weight on impact (Rule, 2013;Raj and Thomas, 2015;Terwee et al, 2018;Shumba et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large body of literature highlights the need to monitor and evaluate CBR programmes in order to build an evidence base for the effectiveness of CBR (Hartley et al, 2009;Madden et al, 2015;Weber et al, 2016;Grandisson et al, 2014;. This is also true of CBR training programmes as there is currently minimal evaluation of the effectiveness of training (Sharma, 2007b;Cornielje et al, 2008).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other reviews on the conceptualisation, characteristics, and impact of CBR consistently report concerns with the methodological quality of evaluation in CBR (Cleaver & Nixon, 2014;Iemmi et al, 2016;M'kumbuzi and Myezwa, 2016). However, the complexity and diversity of CBR creates challenges in monitoring and evaluation of training, including cost, limited capacity and time, and multiple methodological approaches (Cornielje et al, 2008;Lukersmith et al, 2013;Weber et al, 2016). As beneficiaries of CBR services, persons with disabilities should also be involved in the evaluation and monitoring of training to determine its effectiveness (Lukersmith et al, 2013;Madden et al, 2015;Grandisson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation