2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An online learned CRF model for multi-target tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
269
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
269
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods that use stronger and more comprehensive evidence have demonstrated superior performance. These methods consider evidence from all observation pairs [13], observation triplets [14] or higher order relationships [15][16][17][18]. The better performance however comes at a cost of increased computational complexity due to the problem's combinatorial nature.…”
Section: Relationship To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods that use stronger and more comprehensive evidence have demonstrated superior performance. These methods consider evidence from all observation pairs [13], observation triplets [14] or higher order relationships [15][16][17][18]. The better performance however comes at a cost of increased computational complexity due to the problem's combinatorial nature.…”
Section: Relationship To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches [2,4,8,19] considering both the past and the future information typically require low-level observations such as foreground, tracklet, or trajectory, etc. These types of low level observations can be obtained by background modelling [35] (to acquire foreground), or by associating confident responses of a human detector, head detector or part-based detector into tracklets [7,12,17,25,33,43,44,45] (this is the most popular approach since significant progress has been made in the detection field [13,16]), or by estimating trajectories based on the KLT tracker [36] or Kalman Filter [12]. Then, these types of low level observations are associated by optimisation methods, such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) [35], Dynamic Programming, Hungarian algorithm [33,43], greedy bipartite algorithm [34], network flow [41] and K-Shortest Paths (KSP) algorithm [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach falls in the category of tracking by detection methods [4,5,7,33,44], where category-level detectors are utilized to track the target of interest. However, in contrast to these methods, our focus is on tracking continuous 3D pose and 3D aspect parts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%