2010
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Online Community Improves Adherence in an Internet-Mediated Walking Program. Part 1: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Background Approximately half of American adults do not meet recommended physical activity guidelines. Face-to-face lifestyle interventions improve health outcomes but are unlikely to yield population-level improvements because they can be difficult to disseminate, expensive to maintain, and inconvenient for the recipient. In contrast, Internet-based behavior change interventions can be disseminated widely at a lower cost. However, the impact of some Internet-mediated programs is limited by high attrition rate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
227
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
227
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This included social support from other study participants as well as outside members (those who are on the Web site but not part of the study). This is consistent with other research that supports the importance of social support for improving exercise and nutrition [11,26]. However, while social support was found to be helpful among women participants, male participants did not socially interact on the site as much as the women but exhibited lurking behaviors (they would read posts, but not participate).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This included social support from other study participants as well as outside members (those who are on the Web site but not part of the study). This is consistent with other research that supports the importance of social support for improving exercise and nutrition [11,26]. However, while social support was found to be helpful among women participants, male participants did not socially interact on the site as much as the women but exhibited lurking behaviors (they would read posts, but not participate).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A report by the Epsilon company indicates that individuals who use social networking and Web 2.0 applications for health, among other things, do so not simply to learn about treatment options, but also because (a) they find comfort knowing they are not alone; (b) they are able to find answers from other patients=people with similar ailments; (c) they find it empowering; and (d) it enables them to engage more deeply in the management of their health concerns (Richardson et al, 2010). In particular, Web 2.0 technologies and social networking applications may help improve one or more aspects of patient engagement.…”
Section: Integrating Social Media Approaches Into Health Promotion Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 We developed an Internetmediated, pedometer-based walking program called Taking Healthy Steps (THS) to promote PA in people with COPD. [21][22][23][24][25] THS provides iterative step-count feedback, individualized step-count goals, education on disease self-management, motivational support, and an online community of social support. A 3-month singlearm study showed this intervention to be safe, engaging, and able to increase daily step counts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%