2022
DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Online Calculator for Estimating Breast Implant Volume from Imaging

Abstract: Summary: Breast implant surgery remains one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States. Implant exchange can be complicated by unavailability of medical records or implant identification cards. Using chest imaging of 154 breast implants, an algorithm for estimating breast implant volume was generated. Based on four simple measurements and patient body mass index, a free, online calculator was created with a mean error of volume estimate of less than 1 cm3 and a SD of 44 c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this context, controlling the α-value (type 1 error) is a common approach, with other studies often setting an α-value criterion of less than 0.1-0.2. 17,18 Furthermore, unlike conventional statistical methods, AI-driven research sometimes adopts a broader p-value range, particularly when complex interactions between multiple variables, as seen in our study focused on PJK. Thirdly, our analysis relied solely on baseline patient characteristics and their radiologic parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given this context, controlling the α-value (type 1 error) is a common approach, with other studies often setting an α-value criterion of less than 0.1-0.2. 17,18 Furthermore, unlike conventional statistical methods, AI-driven research sometimes adopts a broader p-value range, particularly when complex interactions between multiple variables, as seen in our study focused on PJK. Thirdly, our analysis relied solely on baseline patient characteristics and their radiologic parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The α-value represents the maximum type 1 error probability based on the sample mean value. Given this context, controlling the α-value (type 1 error) is a common approach, with other studies often setting an α-value criterion of less than 0.1–0.2 [ 17 , 18 ]. Furthermore, unlike conventional statistical methods, AI-driven research sometimes adopts a broader p-value range, particularly when analyzing complex interactions between multiple variables, as seen in our study focused on PJK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%