1997
DOI: 10.2737/srs-gtr-016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Old-Growth Definition for Western and Mixed Mesophytic Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P values denoted with asterisks (** < 0.01, * < 0.05, . < 0.1), alpha level 0.10 insensitive to landscape-scale variables (Greenberg et al 1997;Keyser and Brown 2016). These two species, however, showed opposite relationships to basal area of the plot, likely reflecting different abilities to survive under competitive stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…P values denoted with asterisks (** < 0.01, * < 0.05, . < 0.1), alpha level 0.10 insensitive to landscape-scale variables (Greenberg et al 1997;Keyser and Brown 2016). These two species, however, showed opposite relationships to basal area of the plot, likely reflecting different abilities to survive under competitive stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recognising the need to expand initiatives to protect and define old-growth beyond the PNW, the National Old-Growth Task Group was created by the USDA Forest Service in 1988. The National Task Group influenced the recognition of old-growth as a distinct type of forest with unique associated ecological, social, and economic values by recommending that the USDA Forest Service declare it a formal forest resource, which was approved in the form of a national policy in 1989 (Greenberg, 1997). Most importantly, the National Old-Growth Task Group shaped how old-growth was defined across the US, and ultimately around the world, by developing the 'Generic Definition and Description of Old-Growth Forests'.…”
Section: Key Messagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, the National Old-Growth Task Group shaped how old-growth was defined across the US, and ultimately around the world, by developing the 'Generic Definition and Description of Old-Growth Forests'. It was conceived as a reference for uniformly defining interim definitions of old-growth forests in all US forest types (Greenberg, 1997), later to be refined and used for regional inventories by the Forest Service in the early 1990s (USDA Forest Service, 1993). The Generic Definition, which described forests in "later stages of stand development", was based on the research of old-growth forests in the PNW (e.g., Franklin et al, 1981).…”
Section: Key Messagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These forests are not defined or identified by a single attribute, but a combination of several factors may serve as important indicators. There is a wide variability and combination of features exhibited in old-growth forests, and the features do not simply 'add-up' as the sum of a series of rigid criteria (Greenberg et al, 1997). Instead of applying strict dichotomous decisions on determining oldgrowth, there is a strong tendency to apply a gradual scale (index of old-growthness or OGI) to indicate the extent to which a forest or stand meets specific criteria thresholds or approximates certain reference values (Kimmins, 2003).…”
Section: Symbols and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on literature, the most often used indicators and descriptors of old-growth are given below (Barton and Keeton, 2018;Bauhus et al, 2009;Buchwald, 2015;Burrascano et al, 2013;Frelich and Reich, 2003;Gilg, 2005;Greenberg et al, 1997;Hayward, 1991;Hilbert and Wiensczyk, 2007;Hunter, 1989;Kaufmann et al, 1992;Kimmins, 2003;Uhlig et al, 2001; USDA Forest service, 1992.; Wells et al, 1998;Wirth et al, 2009;Ziaco et al, 2012).…”
Section: Symbols and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%