2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Offshore Wind Energy Geographic Information System (OWE-GIS) for assessment of the UK's offshore wind energy potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
65
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Data obtained from Ref. [21] was used to compare factors and to identify the different elements of costs of OWF. It should be noted that the cost values were estimated as an average from the cost of offshore wind projects in the UK spanning the period 2010 to 2015 [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data obtained from Ref. [21] was used to compare factors and to identify the different elements of costs of OWF. It should be noted that the cost values were estimated as an average from the cost of offshore wind projects in the UK spanning the period 2010 to 2015 [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] was used to compare factors and to identify the different elements of costs of OWF. It should be noted that the cost values were estimated as an average from the cost of offshore wind projects in the UK spanning the period 2010 to 2015 [21]. Table 4 gives the cost of the various components for a wind farm including turbine foundation, cabling cost and their percentage of the total cost [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, due to smaller farm area of OWFs in comparison with its on-shore counterpart (identical power rating), the power loss of its electrical interconnection system is relatively lower (mostly, it is just about 1%). Note that, according to the offshore wind characteristic, the annual capacity factors of installed OWFs are generally in the range of 0.33-0.54 [25,26]. Hence, in order to minimize the CAPEX for investors, the power loss is defined as a penalty function with its admissible value (lower than 2%) [13].…”
Section: Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During recent years, due to its flexibility and available features, this spatial analysis tool has been extensively used by renewable energy developers in the context of multi-criteria decision analysis for OWF site selection procedure (see, for example, Atici et al, 2015). Moreover, there are recent studies evaluating OWE development through GIS tools, but only at a national level; for instance, there are assessment studies for Denmark (Möller et al, 2012), Greece (Vagiona and Karanikolas, 2012), Portugal (Costa et al, 2006), and the UK (Cavazzi and Dutton, 2016). Although there are numerous studies proposing multicriteria approaches for wind farm siting (mainly onshore), an integrated approach combining the aforementioned viewpoints with evaluation procedures is still missing for offshore wind applications with reference to an extended spatial scale, such as a large basin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%