“An odyssey without receiving proper care” – experts’ views on palliative care provision for patients with migration background in Germany

Abstract

BackgroundMigrants seem to be underrepresented in palliative care in Germany. Access barriers and challenges in care remain unclear. We aimed to provide a comprehensive insight into palliative care for migrants, using expert interviews.MethodsInterviews with experts on palliative and general health care for migrants were audiotaped and transcribed. Data analysis followed a qualitative content analysis method for expert interviews proposed by Meuser and Nagel.ResultsIn total, 13 experts from various fields (palliative and hospice care, other care, research and training) were interviewed. Experts identified access barriers on the health care system and the patient level as well as the sociopolitical level. Services don’t address migrants, who may use parallel structures. Patients may distrust the health care system, be oriented towards their home country and expect the family to care for them. In care, poor adaptation and inflexibility of health care services regarding needs of migrant patients because of scarce resources, patients’ preferences which may contradict professionals' values, and communication both on the verbal and nonverbal level were identified as the main challenges. Conflicts between patients, families and professionals are at risk to be interpreted exclusively as cultural conflicts. Palliative care providers should use skilled interpreters instead of family interpreters or unskilled staff members, and focus on training cultural competence. Furthermore, intercultural teams could enhance palliative care provision for migrants.ConclusionsThough needs and wishes of migrant patients are often found to be similar to those of non-migrant patients, there are migration-specific aspects that can influence care provision at the end of life. Migration should be regarded as a biographical experience that has a severe and ongoing impact on the life of an individual and their family. Language barriers have to be considered, especially regarding patients' right to informed decision making. The reimbursement of interpreters in health care remains an open question.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-019-0392-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introducing cross-cultural education in palliative care: focus groups with experts on practical strategies

“…These can be related to language barriers, a lack of specific institutional resources (e.g. written material in several languages, interpreters), patients' and relatives' highly divergent expectations and perceptions, and risks of stereotyping [5,6]. When these challenges are not addressed efficiently, medical systems cannot guarantee equitable care [7,8].…”

Quantifying the Language Barrier—A Total Survey of Parents’ Spoken Languages and Local Language Skills as Perceived by Different Professions in Pediatric Palliative Care

“…In the clinical routine in general and particularly in pediatric palliative care, different strategies such as the involvement of (professional) translators are used to overcome language barriers between care providers and patients/families [ 13 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The importance of the awareness and education of cultural characteristics is acknowledged by many healthcare providers, but is perceived as insufficient [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. However, successful intercultural communication can only be achieved if providers develop culturally sensitive skills and hence act on the same linguistic and superordinate cultural level as parents and patients with a different ethnic background [ 22 , 29 , 30 , 31 ].…”

“Withstanding ambivalence is of particular importance”—Controversies among experts on dealing with desire to die in palliative care

“…This situation is especially challenging as a lack of communication often means a lack of social connection that can foster feelings of isolation and a low quality of life [68] which might strengthen a desire to die. Even though adaptive interaction with a focus on nonverbal language [69], alternative communication technologies [68] or calling in a (professional) interpreter [70] can alleviate these difficulties to some degree, the question of how to adequately assess or discuss the desire to die of such patients still needs further research.…”