2018
DOI: 10.30535/mto.24.2.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Octatonic History of Prokofiev’s Compositional Oeuvre

Abstract: The article examines Prokofiev’s compositional oeuvre through the lens of the Rimsky-Korsakov scale (octatonic collection) and its prominence in selected works from 1915 through 1941. Although he never took a composition lesson with Rimsky-Korsakov, Prokofiev’s careful use of the collection shows his intimate knowledge of the scale. The article seeks to add a understanding of the development of the Rimsky-Korsakov scale within Russian theoretical thought. A survey of short octatonic sections culminates in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3–5 and Bass 1988), with reference to set‐theoretical techniques (Minturn 1997), or as framed within tonality but not saturated by it (Cohn 2012, Sologub 2014 and Harley 2020). Furthermore, theories drawing upon the Russian tradition demonstrate the how the concept of lad (loosely equivalent to mode) might aid in our understanding of Prokofiev's harmony (Kholopov 1967 and Skorik 1969; see also Sologub 2014 and Bazayev 2014 and 2018). Traces of tonal convention may remain, but from a common‐practice perspective the ambiguities of harmony, tonality and cadences often outweigh a possible analytical benefit.…”
Section: Topics As Second‐order Formal Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3–5 and Bass 1988), with reference to set‐theoretical techniques (Minturn 1997), or as framed within tonality but not saturated by it (Cohn 2012, Sologub 2014 and Harley 2020). Furthermore, theories drawing upon the Russian tradition demonstrate the how the concept of lad (loosely equivalent to mode) might aid in our understanding of Prokofiev's harmony (Kholopov 1967 and Skorik 1969; see also Sologub 2014 and Bazayev 2014 and 2018). Traces of tonal convention may remain, but from a common‐practice perspective the ambiguities of harmony, tonality and cadences often outweigh a possible analytical benefit.…”
Section: Topics As Second‐order Formal Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%