2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An occasional ornament, part of clothes or just a gift for ancestors? The results of traceological studies of teeth pendants from the Subneolithic sites in Šventoji, Lithuania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), which has been documented in previous experiments [36] and for other ancient ornaments (e.g. [37][38][39][40]). Still, the use-wear traces are visible.…”
Section: (B) Human and Rodent Modification Of Giant Sloth Osteodermssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…), which has been documented in previous experiments [36] and for other ancient ornaments (e.g. [37][38][39][40]). Still, the use-wear traces are visible.…”
Section: (B) Human and Rodent Modification Of Giant Sloth Osteodermssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This pattern has not previously been reported in the traceological literature, which until now has mainly focused on the perforated roots and root tips of the animal teeth, where human-related traces are more easily distinguishable from natural traces (e.g. Larsson 2006;Osipowicz et al 2020;Vanhaeren & d'Errico 2005; see also Van Gijn 2006& 2017 on pendants of other materials). Pits, or craters coming close to pitting, have been reported earlier on the roots of mammalian canines in the Neolithic site of Ajvide in Sweden (Rainio & Mannermaa 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Use-wear analysis of the perforated teeth from Zvejnieki, Latvia, indicates that some of these decorations were worn for a long time before their deposition in the graves, while others were fresh and intact (Larsson 2006). In Šventoji, Lithuania, the perforated teeth were apparently worn on a daily basis (Osipowicz et al 2020). Our analysis of the wild boar and seal teeth from Ajvide, Sweden, brings out a pattern of pits and scratches on the tooth roots, suggesting that the pendants served as portable sound instruments or rattles, in addition to their decorative and possible symbolic functions (Rainio & Mannermaa 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Our microwear analysis of the YOO pendants (Rainio et al forthcoming) indicates that they were used on a daily basis or in ceremonies before being deposited in burials. The use of tooth pendants on a daily basis has been recently suggested also by Osipowicz et al (2019) in their study of drilled tooth pendants found in the Šventoji settlement area in Lithuania. Artefact compositions, such as tooth ornaments, could have been part of costumes and headgear used in rituals and ceremonies, and their rattling sound could have played an important role in these activities (Rainio and Mannermaa 2014;Rainio and Tamboer 2018).…”
Section: Tooth Pendants and Social Structuresmentioning
confidence: 92%