2020
DOI: 10.1177/0142331220932396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An observer-based adaptive control design for the maglev system

Abstract: In this study, a nonlinear adaptive controller that can be used to control a magnetic levitation (maglev) is designed. The designed controller is equipped with a nonlinear velocity observer to provide the control without measuring velocity. Its capability to adaptively compensate all parametric uncertainties during the control process is one of the main advantages of this controller. Utilizing this capability, control of the maglev system can be realized without using any knowledge about system parameters. Due… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is composed of a third degree Hurwitz polynomial whose roots are located sufficiently far into the left half on the complex plane, then the trajectories of the incremental output error e y δ (t), and their corresponding time derivatives exponentially converge to zero. Upon studying the control law proposed in (14) it will be noted that knowledge of the incremental velocity of the magnetic ball, ẏδ (t), is required, signifying that a variable of this nature must either be measured or estimated by an observer. In practise, the estimation is attained by means of online calculations based on high frequency samples of the trajectory of the incremental position variable.…”
Section: A Flatness-based Pole Placement Approach For Stabilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is composed of a third degree Hurwitz polynomial whose roots are located sufficiently far into the left half on the complex plane, then the trajectories of the incremental output error e y δ (t), and their corresponding time derivatives exponentially converge to zero. Upon studying the control law proposed in (14) it will be noted that knowledge of the incremental velocity of the magnetic ball, ẏδ (t), is required, signifying that a variable of this nature must either be measured or estimated by an observer. In practise, the estimation is attained by means of online calculations based on high frequency samples of the trajectory of the incremental position variable.…”
Section: A Flatness-based Pole Placement Approach For Stabilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, cascading schemes are a solution in this case. For instance, a cascade control structure based on the electrical and electromechanical subsystems that make up MLS platforms and validated it through numerical and experimental tests has been designed [14]. In this approach, the voltage control input required to control the ball position was determined using a PI whose reference signal is the electromagnet current determined by a non-linear adaptive controller combined with a velocity observer to compensate for its missing measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Adil et al (2020) has proposed super-twisting sliding mode controllers for the magnetic levitation systems, such that the air gap is maintained at the stable value. It can be seen from Bidikli (2020) that the maglev systems can conduct system controlling without using any knowledge about system parameters. In addition, the magnetic levitation systems has been widely used in the field of various fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a third component, a PID controller was used for the stabilization of this three component control system. In addition to neural control approaches, some recent works also demonstrated the use of other control approaches such as observer-based adaptive control [31] and the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy controller [32] a for magnetic levitation control problem. However, these works have not purposely focused on disturbance rejection control performance of magnetic levitation control system..…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%