1981
DOI: 10.2307/1129256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Observational Study of Social Comparison in Preschoolers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As predicted, girls interacting with girls spoke more often than boys interacting with boys about similarity between self and other, a gender difference that proved to be driven primarily by African American girls. Previous studies of naturally occurring social comparisons (Chafel, 1986;Frey & Ruble, 1985;Mosatche & Bragioner, 1981) have not uncovered gender differences, although Mosatche and Bragonier (1981) and Frey and Ruble did not distinguish between highlighting similarities and highlighting differences. The use of social comparison, especially by girls and especially by African American girls, to find common ground and solidify relationships warrants further attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As predicted, girls interacting with girls spoke more often than boys interacting with boys about similarity between self and other, a gender difference that proved to be driven primarily by African American girls. Previous studies of naturally occurring social comparisons (Chafel, 1986;Frey & Ruble, 1985;Mosatche & Bragioner, 1981) have not uncovered gender differences, although Mosatche and Bragonier (1981) and Frey and Ruble did not distinguish between highlighting similarities and highlighting differences. The use of social comparison, especially by girls and especially by African American girls, to find common ground and solidify relationships warrants further attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The majority of these comments were made when two children were engaged in associative or cooperative play (53.8%) or were simply conversing (21.2%). Because of our interest in multiple features of children's comments, and following the example of Mosatche and Bragonier (1981), we configured the data set such that the comment rather than the child served as the unit of analysis. Contingency tables analyses were used to compare the percentages of statements of each focus, type, and valence through four planned contrasts: gender differences in same-gender contexts (BB vs. GG), gender differences in mixed-gender contexts (BG vs. GB), context effects on boys (BB vs. BG), and context effects on girls (GG vs. GB).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations