2017
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201701-058oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Observational Study of Outcomes and Tolerances in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Initiated on Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor

Abstract: This study highlights the prevalence of adverse effects in a CF population newly exposed to lumacaftor/ivacaftor and demonstrates a relatively high rate of drug intolerance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment benefits in patient with ppFEV 1 b 40 were consistent with the overall patient population; however, an increased incidence of respiratory events, including dyspnea and chest tightness, were observed [7]. In the clinical practice setting, there have been reports of increased frequency in respiratory adverse events (AEs) in patients with ppFEV 1 b 40 initiating treatment with LUM/IVA [8][9][10]. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of LUM/IVA in patients with CF who were homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation and had advanced lung disease (ppFEV 1 b 40) in a prospective, open-label, 24-week clinical study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Treatment benefits in patient with ppFEV 1 b 40 were consistent with the overall patient population; however, an increased incidence of respiratory events, including dyspnea and chest tightness, were observed [7]. In the clinical practice setting, there have been reports of increased frequency in respiratory adverse events (AEs) in patients with ppFEV 1 b 40 initiating treatment with LUM/IVA [8][9][10]. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of LUM/IVA in patients with CF who were homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation and had advanced lung disease (ppFEV 1 b 40) in a prospective, open-label, 24-week clinical study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This analysis showed an increase (versus placebo) of 3.7 and 3.3 percentage points over placebo in the two dosing groups ( p=0.024 and 0.036, respectively) and a 9.9-9.1% relative increase in FEV 1 % pred, also highly clinically significant. Body mass index increased significantly only in one of [16][17][18][19][20]. Collectively, these case series report a reduction in exacerbation frequency.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Cftr Modulators In People With Advanced Pulmonarmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To see if an increase in patients' number could yield a different result, we extended the analyses of clinical parameters to 20 other patients, however resulting in no statistically significant changes. Our cohort of 34 patients comprises subjects with a broad respiratory function at the baseline (from 21 to 118 FEV 1 %), and this may constitute a big difference with phase 3 studies, in which patients were initially excluded if their baseline lung function (FEV1%) was less than 40%, as also has been observed in a recent observational study [31]. Again, this consideration indicates conducting observational studies in a higher number of patients with more homogenous clinical status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%