2006
DOI: 10.1080/00207170500472909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An observability form for linear systems with unknown inputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [24], the authors presented an observation algorithm in order to put a linear system with unknown inputs in a set of block triangular observable forms, even if the matching condition was not fulfilled, and a finite time sliding mode observer was designed in order to estimate the state and the unknown inputs in [25]. The main idea of this algorithm is to take advantage of some equivalent output injections in order to generate fictitious outputs such that the system can be transformed into a set of block observable triangular forms.…”
Section: Extension Of the Matching Condition For Nonlinear Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24], the authors presented an observation algorithm in order to put a linear system with unknown inputs in a set of block triangular observable forms, even if the matching condition was not fulfilled, and a finite time sliding mode observer was designed in order to estimate the state and the unknown inputs in [25]. The main idea of this algorithm is to take advantage of some equivalent output injections in order to generate fictitious outputs such that the system can be transformed into a set of block observable triangular forms.…”
Section: Extension Of the Matching Condition For Nonlinear Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: By following similar steps as those used in the proof of Proposition 3.1, we can find G * ϕ i|t and H * ϕ i|t as (43), where λ * i is the optimal solution of the Lagrangian multiplier corresponding to constraint (42c). Indicated by the KKT conditions, either λ * i = 0, or constraint (42c) holds at equality.…”
Section: Distributed Minimum Variance Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [43], this condition is relaxed however, by identifying the various matrices, the relaxed condition results in rank(C i ) ≥ n, which can be realized only for rank(C i ) = n in our setting. Thus, if C i is full rank, observability is guaranteed and, moreover, we have that C i ν ϕ i|t is full column rank independently of the message loss process.…”
Section: Distributed Minimum Variance Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work aims at the development of a systematic method leading to the finite time observation of a class of nonlinear systems with unknown inputs even if the observability matching condition is not fulfilled. To this end, the procedure given in [5] is extended to the nonlinear case. It also results in a constructive algorithm that transforms the system into a similar type of block triangular observable forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%