2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04081.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An objective scoring tool in the management of patients with pituitary apoplexy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recently published retrospective surgical series, a grading system based on clinical findings has been proposed; lower grades (1-3) were more frequently associated with complete recovery of the hypopituitarism than higher grades (4-5) (112).…”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recently published retrospective surgical series, a grading system based on clinical findings has been proposed; lower grades (1-3) were more frequently associated with complete recovery of the hypopituitarism than higher grades (4-5) (112).…”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data suggested that a PAS over four might be an argument for emergency surgery, but prospective studies are needed for further validation. Another clinical grading system with potential implications for PA management was recently developed (112).…”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recentemente, gli stessi autori hanno anche suggerito l'adozione di uno score di valutazione del paziente con apoplessia ipofisaria in fase acuta, finalizzato all'obiettiva individuazione del miglior percorso terapeutico [12]. Esso si basa sull'attribuzione di un punteggio complessivo risultante dalla somma di 3 parametri neuro-oftalmologici-acuità visiva (grado 0, 1 o 2), presenza di deficit campimetrici (grado 0, 1 o 2) e paresi oculare (grado 0, 1 o 2)-e del Glasgow Coma Scale (grado 0, 2 o 4).…”
Section: Le Strategie Terapeuticheunclassified
“…PAS can also be a useful tool to monitor patient being managed conservatively and progressive increase in the score during the period of observation may prompt consideration for surgery. [25] However, as suggested by the UK guideline development group, clinical outcomes of management decisions based on PAS needs validation by prospective studies.…”
Section: Pitutary Apoplexy Score (Pas)mentioning
confidence: 99%