1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00218-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that among the controls significantly more clinical experience was present, did not seem to contribute much to their performance outcome, as observers agreed (there were no significant differences between observers on outcome parameters) ( Table 3). Rating scales were constructed for the observers because this is regarded as the most reliable and valid method for observers to use in assessing performance during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that among the controls significantly more clinical experience was present, did not seem to contribute much to their performance outcome, as observers agreed (there were no significant differences between observers on outcome parameters) ( Table 3). Rating scales were constructed for the observers because this is regarded as the most reliable and valid method for observers to use in assessing performance during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motion analysis systems have been used in simulation centers to objectively measure technical dexterity and learning of surgical skills [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] , but it has not been possible to use them in the operating room because most are tethered by wires and are based on electromagnetic tracking. As such, assessment in the real operating theater is limited to paper methods such as Global Rating Scales and checklists [22][23][24][25][26][27] . These are time-consuming but, at present, are the only methods practical for use in the operating theater.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another tool, Eubank's Checklist, was used to assess the technical skills of surgical residents during laparoscopic cholecystectomies. It utilized videotapes of recorded laparoscopic cholecystectomies and three different experienced surgeons to evaluate the technical skill of surgical residents using a points system (Ahmed et al, 2011;Eubanks et al, 1999). While this method does provide some level of information regarding a resident's technical skills it requires a large amount of expertise and outside time to assess resident skills.…”
Section: Alternative Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%